|
This has long been known as ABACAB.
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve been playing with a shiny new Microsoft Surface RT that I’ve had for about a month now. I’ve had a bunch of requests for a post about my experience with it thus far, so here we go.... In an unsurprising twist ending, I wrote the first few drafts of this entire post on my Surface RT. I used the Touch Cover for most of it, and then picked up a Type Cover toward the end and used that for the rest. Digging below the surface of life with a Surface RT.
|
|
|
|
|
And so the PC ends with a whimper, not a bang. Broadwell will be available in a ‘desktop’ variant as well as a laptop version, but neither will be socketed. There are a lot of good technical reasons to release it only as an embedded and mobile CPU, but not for anyone other than Intel. They want more of the PC ecosystem, and are taking it. Enthusiasts have been written off, and the rest of the ecosystem is being preemptively kneecapped in case they try to step out of line. The desktop is dead, and with it, PCs become irrelevant, mobile or not. Broadwell CPUs will end the long run of socketed, DIY computer building.
|
|
|
|
|
In other news, AMD got relevant again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.. but they could probably change that, if they wanted
|
|
|
|
|
Laying off thousands of engineers at AMD is not going to help the situation. Neither is their stock price decline or them considering using ARM.
John
|
|
|
|
|
Even if they wanted to, AMD's much slower cadence of major architecture shifts means it would be a long time out. BullDudzer was AMD's first major (high performance) architecture change since the first A64 operons in 2003. They spent most of the 8 years between doing minor tweaks that, after Intel started smoking them with Core2, were always massively overhyped in advance as being able to close the gap before release hardware showed it actually widened. BullDudzer's architecture (and the new ARM license) was throwing in the towel and admitting that they're not going to be able to beat Intel at it's own game. Quite frankly I'm not convinced that AMD will still be in the x86 business (or in business at all for that matter) in 2019.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I thought before I got this news - but this might change things. After all, with Intel gone from that niche, AMD only needs to come up with something "not completely laughable". They haven't succeeded at that lately, but it doesn't look to me as though they were even trying.
|
|
|
|
|
They'd need to do a lot better than just "not completely laughable"; Intel's lead is large enough that I strongly suspect even their mobile chips at stock speeds would beat an OCed AMD desktop chip for gaming.
I also don't see anything in the SA article that indicates that the gaming mobo makers won't be able to produce OC friendly boards with soldered 45xx/46xx/47xx chips. Having to swap the two parts as a whole will hurt repairability; but with the incremental gains on Intel's Tock's having been so minor and each Tick needing a new socket anyway, swapping CPUs as an upgrade path is much less important than it was in the LGA775 era anyway.
SA is IMO massively overstating the impact from the switch from LGA1366 leading with the enthusiast product and the alleged enthusiast product LGA2011 lagging badly behind the mainstream part. Except for the 3 GPU user and LN2 benchmarking crowds LGA1155 has met most enthusiast needs quite well. The 3rd memory channel almost never mattered; and the extra PCIe lanes almost never matters for 2 GPU gaming use while the southbridge has enough lanes for almost all in addition to a high performance GPU needs.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Thinking about this a bit more, I'm coming to the conclusion that SA has it backwards and it might actually end up being good for mobo-vendors, if not necessarily for consumers. A common thread I've seen in Anandtech motherboard reviews over the last year or two is that there's increasingly little reason to buy a top of the line motherboard instead of a midrange one (or a brandname budget board if you historically have shopped in the middle tier) because the increased integration of subsystems and tighter QA have meant that even budget boards are highly reliable and that the additional features on high end boards are increasingly less likely to be useful to enthusiasts and instead only serve to pad profit margins.
It's unlikely we'll see OEMs bloat their SKUs from ~10 to ~100 to include each current possible mobo+CPU pair. Instead what will probably happen is that the number of base mobo designs will drop since they no longer need to come up with minimally different boards to populate $20 increment between $100 and $300 to meet market segmentation/pricepoint matching goals. Instead there will probably be only a few base boards at low/medium/high prices matched with Intel's low/medium/high price CPUs (and only limited overlap between the CPU buckets). The lower number of base board designs from each vendor will probably boost differentiation between them; which currently is little more than plastic color and heatsink shape. Assuming they don't all make the same set of tradeoff's we'll actually have real competition in board vendors again. The only groups of consumers almost certain to lose are those who currently pair i7 CPUs with very low end mobos or who put Celerons in kitchen sink mobos.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Story.
I just checked, and this applies to the US market. Still no factory unlocked phone, however.
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/windows-8.html[^]
Some high (or low) points:
- Surface start screen [is] an incessantly blinking, unruly environment that feels like dozens of carnival barkers yelling at you simultaneously
- the main UI restricts users to a single window, so the product ought to be renamed "Microsoft Window."
- On a regular PC, Windows 8 is Mr. Hyde: a monster that terrorizes poor office workers and strangles their productivity.
I just wish he'd just come out and say what he really meant...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I especially like the part about "Low Information Density". 
But I remember how Mr. Nielsens own homepage have looked over the years, so it's a bit hard to take him to seriously.
Especially since he disallows archiving of his site.
People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.
|
|
|
|
|
You can photograph it with your phone! 
Wout
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, he really doesn't seem to get Metro at all. How much information do you need at the same time in front of your eyes?
modified 6-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I admire Jakob for the boldness in the choice of colours on his site.
There's usable. And then there's taste.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
True, but while I agree with most that he writes the result on his own homepage isn't that usable. The colours I'm actually not having a problem with. They're odd, not bad. Like orange.
People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey. That hurts. That hurts bad.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
"Lack of multiple windows" certainly discourages desktop users.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
Tomz_KV wrote: "Lack of multiple windows" certainly discourages desktop users.
Who'll just end up using the desktop for multiple apps.
|
|
|
|
|
Curiously, i was reading a review that praised Windows 8 before reading this. An althought sometimes he have a point, mainly when he refers to the discoverability of features, i believe he over reacts, specially when he calls Windows 8 on the PC Mr. Hyde.
I believe that as a new product it have a learning curve, but it's not as steep as he make it sounds. For a user that gives a damn about the Modern UI and only uses the Desktop, the only new thing he needs to learn is to click in the Start popup in the lower left corner (which can be done also by clicking the Windows key on the keyboard).
|
|
|
|
|
I find that web site archaic and ugly - not sure we should listen to what he has to say about usability and design as a result.
I've had Windows 8 on my 3+ year old laptop for about three weeks since the old SSD died. I have to say I hate it less than I though I would. The jumping between UI's is only a slight PITA. Most of my day is spent running Windows apps on the desktop, and I hardly see the start screen. It all therefore looks very much like Windows 7 with a flatter theme. I can even run a 'Metro' app side by side on a single monitor with the desktop - i find docking the messaging Metro app like this is quite efficient.
Some things are harder to get to, and that's annoying, but I remember feeling much the same by some of the changes in XP as opposed to 2000. In general, though, I now have a laptop that:
1. Runs desktop apps faster than under Win 7
2. Runs cooler
3. Has longer battery life
4. Has faster shutdown/startup/sleep/wake times
I can't imagine I will ever sit and stare at the start screen as it's tiles scroll through three lines of info, so think it's a bit pointless. However as an occasional app starter, it's quite efficient with a little customisation.
I've added no third party utilities to 'improve' the interface, wanted to live with it out of the box for a while. I found adding a toolbar pointed to C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs (the old Start Menu location) and a few apps pinned to the taskbar provides a pretty good way to start most things without context switching.
Rod
|
|
|
|
|
I've had the Nest for a few weeks now and while I can't tell if it's saved me a pile of money yet, I can note a number of significant things that have made a difference to me and the family. The best thing about the Nest. It's simple and its simplicity hides enormous complexity. The right way to internet-enable an appliance?
|
|
|
|
|
LLVM is a complex piece of software. There are several paths one may take on the quest of understanding how it works, none of which is simple. I recently had to dig in some areas of LLVM I was not previously familiar with, and this article is one of the outcomes of this quest. What I aim to do here is follow the various incarnations an "instruction" takes when it goes through LLVM’s multiple compilation stages, starting from a syntactic construct in the source language and until being encoded as binary machine code in an output object file. The amazing lifecycle of a simple division operation. Part 1: The Miracle of Birth...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
