|
CalmComm ~ where you calmly communicate something you don't want it noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's chatbot Tay may have suffered a racist meltdown last week, but the company is not giving up on AI. Based on the way the last one turned out, I don't think we should get Neville Chamberlain to speak with these
|
|
|
|
|
Rumors have these bots will be used to promote Windows 10 - I prefer the racist...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 10 was the focus of Microsoft's day one keynote at its annual Build developer conference. Today, the company announced an update that'll ship this summer called the "Anniversary Update." Windows 10 - the 'real' release
|
|
|
|
|
Timing, cost, and the right license made all the difference People like penguins
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, I must have missed the "flourishing". When did that happen?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Are you kidding? This is The Year of Linux! (25th anniversary edition)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
You may missed the server side of your application 
Linux isn't about desktop mainly...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The article actually touches upon the kernel. And if you think about the kernel flourishing (not the desktop software) then it maybe makes sense.
At least in light of Android being built on the Linux kernel. 
My forthcoming book, Launch Your Android App, is available for pre-sale at Amazon.com -- releases on April 1, 2016 (no joke). 
|
|
|
|
|
Android, OSX, Firefox OS, Chromium OS is just a - very - few samples of systems based on Linux kernel (and there are hundred of others)...So there is a flourishing there...But also there is the fact that while Linux did't conquered desktop (a lack of decent UI) it did conquered server...
2/3 of the small servers on the internet are Linux...
Near to 99% of the so-called supercomputers running Linux...
1/3 of the embedded devices run Linux, and in this part, more than 50% of the devices running on specific OS, and even the missing 20% does not go to some rival OS, like Windows or OSX...
So definitely, Linux flourishing...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a very interesting article and makes a sound argument for the reasons for the success of the Linux kernel. 
My forthcoming book, Launch Your Android App, is available for pre-sale at Amazon.com -- releases on April 1, 2016 (no joke).
|
|
|
|
|
You'll soon be able to run Ubuntu on Windows 10. Wiggly Worm edition?
Not a repeat, but a expansion of the news from yesterday
|
|
|
|
|
You can already run Ubuntu WITHOUT Windows 10. Why cripple it ("it" = Ubuntu)?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer the old and good VM way...Both OSes have it problems, I see nothing good comes out of mixing them...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Just another way to try to assimilate Linux devs into the Microsoft sphere.
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I followed that article to a blog post by Scott Hanselman[^] which contained this little gem:
Quote: After you're setup, run apt-get update and get a few developer packages. I wanted Redis and Emacs. I did an apt-get install emacs23 to get emacs. Note this is the actual emacs retrieved from Ubuntu's feed.
Of course, I have no idea how to CLOSE emacs, so I'll close the window.
I thought that was VI. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
He seems to have comprehension problems. The Emacs screen he is looking at includes:
"Exit Emacs C-x C-c"
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance.
The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices. We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!
|
|
|
|
|
Spoiler: "they didn't."
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Apple doesn't need the FBIs assistance. All they need to do is post a sizeable bounty for anyone that can crack their security. Once they find out how it's done, they can redesign it. Problem solved, and f*ck the FBI.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
If the data is on a remote and protected server, there would be little use in hacking the phones' hardware. I assume it is about a backup on the Apple-network, because if the data was on the phone it could be retrieved.
I'm guessing the FBI wants to save face - we're still waiting for any explanation on "how" they cracked the phone 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
The entire "you must pwn the phone for us" cluster elephant was triggered when a retard at the FBI ordered the icloud password be changed; preventing the phone from being forced into backing itself up to the cloud where they could pillage the data.
At the same time they began to back down in court, the FBI paid an Israeli computer forensics company about $20k for unspecified services. Odds are pretty good that company has a zeroday that can execute on a locked phone over USB.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Nice thread title. 
Except of course there is no report or quote that indicates Apple has even asked the FBI. Nor is there anything in the article that indicates that the FBI wouldn't provide it if asked.
0) I suspect Apple has at least a couple guesses.
1) Given the recent past I seriously doubt Apple would ask the FBI.
2) Likewise I seriously doubt the FBI would (or should) tell them.
3) I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.
There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Mullikin wrote: I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.
Why would they do that?  If they really haven't cracked it why drop the case?
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, they were starting to lose in the court of public opinion. After playing the "terrorism" card and claiming this was a one time request the Feds had public support, but as reality set in and the media actually started reporting opposing opinions things shifted and they lost public support (in the US at least).
Secondly, a majority of legal and constitutional scholars predicted a win in actual court by Apple which sets the wrong precedent as far as the Feds are concerned.
Thirdly, others in the federal government pointed out that many federal employees use iPhones and by creating such a hack (that will eventually leak to other governments and hackers) the Feds were shooting themselves in the foot over the long haul.
Lastly, they might have finally realized that any 4 month old data that might exist on this phone is likely worthless.
Better to claim they hacked it and save their legal challenges for another day or another victim.
There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
