|
The breakthrough could "usher in an era of virtually limitless power production," MIT News wrote. Magnets. Why is it always magnets?
|
|
|
|
|
Wait a second, aren't superconductors extremely cold and fusion is extremely hot?
How does that work?
Oh, I know, they are using all those old McDLT boxes McDonalds has left over. The ones where the cool stays cool and the hot stays hot.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Why is it always magnets?
McGyver (the original) used chewing gum, better so?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine you’ve been tasked with fixing a bug. Or you discovered an issue while implementing a feature. With no obvious solution, you ask around to see if anyone has ideas. Nobody does. Or none of their ideas work. It looks like you’re on your own. "Never give up, never surrender!"
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking "Just keep swimming, just keep swimming."
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: you ask around to see if anyone has ideas. Nobody does. Or none of their ideas work. It looks like you’re on your own.
just like another day in the office... where is the point?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
More information from Stack Overflow will appear in ChatGPT, and Stack Overflow will use OpenAI models for its products. Oh, oh. Now the AIs are going to know how to mark us as duplicate and close us
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Oh, oh. Now the AIs are going to know how to mark us as duplicate and close us
While being haughty, respectless and bullying other people to satisfy their own ego data feed
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
For most of us, having more than a couple dozen browser tabs open at once feels like a cluttered nightmare. But for one software engineer, managing nearly 7,500 active Firefox tabs is just another day at the office. And how many of them were the same page (because they couldn't find the original)?
|
|
|
|
|
The feature is rolling out to all YouTube Premium subscribers - here's how to enable it. The commercials?
At least as far as they seem to be concerned
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft wants to improve Copilot's experiences in Windows and will use user feedback to make it happen. Probably nothing at all to do with the new security focus
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: on what users 'ACTUALLY' want
Are they really telling this? If yes, it is like officially telling the world the gave a rat fat about people before.
I know, I know... we already knew that. But one thing is doing and another is telling the truth publicly
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Professors are shifting away from syntax and emphasizing higher-level skills This will end well, won't it?
|
|
|
|
|
It's probably pretty good to shake stuff up if the focus has been on "syntax" instead of these higher-level skills they're gonna do now instead.
This does explain a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: This will end well, won't it?
Worse than lately can not be... can it?  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's pointers all the way down
|
|
|
|
|
An attempt by a Catholic advocacy group to spread the word of God using an AI model has backfired, and chat bot – Father Justin – has been pulled down and reworked. But Brawndo's got what parishioners crave. It's got electrolytes.
Edit: decided not to go with a direct quote, but a play on it instead
modified 5hrs 5mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Where is people going to accept / to even realize, that IT IS NOT FVCKING AI, only advanced statistics.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Starting with Windows 11 version 24H2, Microsoft's operating system requires ARM v8.1 to run. You have the right to bear ARM, just not on the new stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Starting with Windows 11 version 24H2, Microsoft's operating system requires ARM v8.1 to run.
Nice... this way they will have to leave us alone.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at this unscientific survey to discover some ways to keep developers happy. A (very) abbreviated list
|
|
|
|
|
First link below the article:
"Why companies are leaving the cloud?"
My nice-to-have answer: Hopefully because common sense is getting wider in the C-Levels?
The probably answer: Because the greed of the cloud providers is too big and some companies have no other choice than to go back to something more predictable, like hosting own hardware?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 8 mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Leaving the cloud?! Really? I wonder to what extent it's true, but I've always been amused by the centralized versus distributed manias. Mainframes => workstations => servers => desktops => The Cloud™.
A couple of English things. For previsible, I think you want predictable. And is sucking off isn't an expression I would use here... 
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. I edited the message
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
