|
Hmmm... "decoupling of .NET from Windows" and "UWP" in the same sentence. A carefully wrote blog no doubt...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I can’t understate how big of a departure this is from things like Lightswitch and RAD / drag-n-drop programming, .NET’s mainstay of yesteryear.
Yes, because the command line is so much more superior as a way of developing large scale applications. 
The days of .NET meetups merely being poorly executed Windows Azure and MVC infomercials are numbered.
Gads, that blog reads like a infomercial. 
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Things are so much better now: I can't understand why I get this silly sense of frustration going through endless cycles of clean-rebuild-build to get VS2017 to compile relatively simple code prototyping forays.
And, how ridiculous of me to feel irritated as accessing VS2017 help via F1 takes me to a generic web-page for VS2015 that has no relevance to the .NET object selected in the code file.
But, there are some benefits (fringe) in being old, and on the sidelines: I often end up laughing at the juxtaposition of these incredible software development tools, now in the hands of "mere mortals," and their weird dysfunctions 
p.s. serves me right for over-riding my wait-until-later-in-the-game to upgrade any hard/soft-ware principles. I was noodling along fine with VS 2015.
cheers from the fringe, Bill
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
From Silicon Valley startups to the U.S. Department of Defense, scientists and engineers are hard at work on a brain-computer interface that could turn us into programmable, debuggable machines You first
|
|
|
|
|
No, you go.
I um... gotta do something.
|
|
|
|
|
It could sell, it just needs right pitch.
"Debug your mother-in-law, you know she needs it"
!false - It's funny, because it's true
|
|
|
|
|
We don't manage to make machines as it should yet and they want to start messing with our brains?
This is going to end bad, very bad...
BTW... link requires login
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 6-Jun-17 6:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor doctors.....
Patient A: "Doctor, I have a skin rash and when I checked my skin it's giving me an error message."
Doctor: "And.....the error message is?"
Patient A: "Methylprednisolone ointment missing, please purchase some from your local chemist and apply to the affected area"
Doctor: "And....have you tried that?"
Patient A: "Can you explain in more detail?"
Patient B: "Doctor, it hurts to swallow and when I checked my throat it's giving me an error message."
Doctor: *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
So there's still a glimmer of hope for politicians.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
As we had not enough with corrupted politicians... now you want to add hacked politicians to the equation? 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: now you want to add hacked politicians to the equation?
Hell, they're already hacked. What I want is debugged politicians, those that do the right thing more often than not.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
debugged != error free (sadly learned on the bad way)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
While that's certainly true, I'll take debugged things over non-debugged things any day.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
For the first time since 2003, Microsoft is considering a point release for C#. Currently marked as C# 7.1, the next version of the language is expected to include Async Main, Default Expressions, Infer Tuple Names, and Pattern-matching with Generics. They're still updating that old thing?
|
|
|
|
|
That default think looks ugly, and I'm not seeing any good problem for it to solve.
OTOH it's been a year or two since the last time MS changed direction and decided to let C# and VB.net be their own things, so I suppose we're due for a wave of converge all the things no matter how bad an idea any particular convergence is.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The algorithms predicted patient mortality 69 percent of the time. If you let an AI "examine" your organs, I think you'll be dying soonish
Also, I think I saw this movie
|
|
|
|
|
Now AI want's to fondle us hu.... We'll that came sooner than I thought. 
|
|
|
|
|
When you factor in the selection bias (people who pay for a CT scan probably already suspect their health) and demographics (people do tend to die of other things) I think you get a less impressive result though.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: an AI system that can tell if you're going to die
Just written one myself (I can't be arsed to put it on GitHub but here's the full source code):
return true;
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
 
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Noone who's ever had their liver taken out by us has survived. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It's all about the "patient data" and then the AI will prescribe "Morphine" for the patient and then you know what I mean...
The best way to make your dreams come true is to wake up.
Paul Valery
|
|
|
|
|
Scanning yourself often leads to a probability of 1.
|
|
|
|
|
He called for a “National Algorithm Safety Board,” similar to the US’s National Transportation Safety Board for vehicles, which would provide both ongoing and retroactive oversight for high-stakes algorithms. Because no one knows best about regulating AI than government regulators
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
