|
I'm just gonna wok away from this.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea, you don't want to Stir-fry up a commotion.
|
|
|
|
|
To keep going would show wonton disregard for this community.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
That's what you soy!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I can be dim sumtimes...
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
We appear to be on a pancake-roll here.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it's making me hot and sour.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
We can always canton Ravi to come up with a good one!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to cause a stir, fry posting that in QA.
|
|
|
|
|
snap!
|
|
|
|
|
ND CHPSTKS URGNTZZZZZZ!!!!!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So wok. Everyone noodle about that! Soy what you will, but you can't just keep dumpling that kind of stuff on us
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah! The Mote in Hastur's Eye.
Is it's name Murcheson, by any chance?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm reading a C# book that was recommended on here recently and found this gem in the beginning.
Quote: The truth of the matter is that many of C#’s syntactic constructs are modeled after various aspects of Visual Basic (VB) and C++.
TROELSEN, ANDREW; Japikse, Philip. C# 6.0 and the .NET 4.6 Framework (Kindle Locations 3123-3124). Apress. Kindle Edition.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny, C# was modeled mostly after Java and C++, but no one ever mentions the Java part.
modified 2-Aug-17 11:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
Citation?
I always wanted to do that once. I used to be too trusting and took everybody's word for everything.
I do remember hearing about the C++ part, but was copying Java not the typical accusation from the Javaites, used to dismiss C# as cheap imitation?
|
|
|
|
|
Visual J++ - Wikipedia
Quote: Microsoft later developed the C# ("C Sharp") language as the primary language for the .NET platform, which was in many ways influenced by Java; subsequently the .NET Framework shares many ideas in common with Java. Much like Java, C# is compiled to a type of bytecode (called CIL), and runs on top of a virtual machine called the Common Language Runtime in .NET. Visual Studio 2005 was the last release to include J#.
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, but even C# 1.0 took some things further than Java did at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, there was good (and new) stuff from the start - it was kind of like an improved C++/Java language from day one and has evolved from their ever since.
J++ had some improvements over Java too, it was just a really poor choice of name that put off both Java and C++ developers from the start.
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The improvements on J++ were the reason for abandoning J++. Did they not put Microsoft before the choice of removing them or else losing the license for J++?
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like it was more of a legal thing with Sun.. from 2002, Sun, Microsoft settle Java suit - CNET
Quote: A Microsoft representative said the dispute lingered for too long. "We don't think anyone wins, but considering the lawsuit has been ongoing for three years, this is a good conclusion to this controversy," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Cullinan.
With the deal struck, Cullinan said Microsoft will be allowed to continue to offer its existing Java products, including its popular J++ development tool, for the next seven years. Microsoft product manager Tony Goodhew said the company will include J++ as a separate CD with the next version of Visual Studio.
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|