|
There was an easter egg hunt in Laval (Québec) a couple of years ago that turned into a riot.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, sh1te!
This doesn't mean that there'll be yet another 8 seasons of GoT, does it?
If I have to sit through more of that overblown garbage, I'll end up topping myself.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Strangely enough, I've not watched a single episode.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The "What shall we watch" area of a marital relationship is the one area where I would consider wife-swapping.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Half a dozen Greek sibilants, no just one, leads to quality (3, 5)
|
|
|
|
|
Six Sigma
Half a Dozen = 6
Greek Sibilant = Σ (Sigma)
leads to Quality = Six Sigma is a Project Management tool
|
|
|
|
|
Well done, you are up tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
what would be a suitable time to post?
|
|
|
|
|
The "agreed" posting time is 10:00 CET
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Early as possible, to avoid the "Oi! Stuart Jeffery" messages.
|
|
|
|
|
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And if he posts on Good Friday he might have to post: "Oi Everyone! Where are you?"
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
|
If React and Angular didn't exist, this would change everything!!!
Thanks for the heads up though, I'll certainly learn how to use it, in case it comes up.
|
|
|
|
|
Pfff... I much prefer knockoutjs or vuejs..
But do give it a look, you'll be surprised....
Further this is based on WebAssembly, it's a performance boost as well as a better MVVM mmm... framework?
|
|
|
|
|
I've only used both in passing. I love Angular. React is survivable.
I will look at this, but I doubt it will go far. It's experimental right now....
|
|
|
|
|
Do you doubt your interest or Microsoft's?
Blazor is pretty much certain to happen at this stage, as far as Microsoft s concern at the moment...
The only problem I had with it is debugging... Though even that seems possible if you hack a bit...
Debug Blazor | Microsoft Docs
As for the adoption. I will bet on an adoption rate similar to how MVC overtook WebForms... Slow but certain...
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt the interest of the world at large
MVC overtook webforms. I was there, I took part. Then Angular overtook MVC.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha... that's a fair point!
Though I do believe Blazor has a very small learning curve and much easier and robust programming model...
Hence I believe it has good future!
|
|
|
|
|
I feel blazor sharp mate, I can tell ya that after six pints or so.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
I will definitely take a look. Thanks for the post and links!
Latest Article - A 4-Stack rPI Cluster with WiFi-Ethernet Bridging
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
It looks really interesting, and I want to use it, but it's experimental status keeps me from doing so.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I think I replied to something similar a bit back, but for the record...
Blazor's big advantage is that you get to use the same language on client and server and it's a real language, not a toy language. Those two things in and of themselves should make everything else obsolete for the most part, IMO. And of course they are getting ever closer to a practical WASM based client, which makes it even more appealing.
It's pretty easy to use and to create new components. It is HTML/CSS based ultimately, which sucks, but that is an equally distinct suckage quotient for pretty much all its competitors so it's a wash in terms of comparisons.
It's pretty straightforward to dynamically generate content, though it has limitations in terms of component inheritance wrt to component containment, which kind of sucks and they apparently don't care enough about that to do anything about it since they silently closed my issue last week on the matter.
It has a quite flexible embedded code/data in HTML scheme that makes it pretty easy to just embed references to component members and have them become part of the HTML, or to easily generate HTML content in place with code snippets. And/or you can have 'code behind' for much more complex processing.
However, because it's HTML based but it's sort of 'double buffered' in that they maintain their own hierarchy and go from that to HTML, changes can't really automatically show up. You have to force a refresh in lots of cases to get that to happen, and it's easy to miss places where you need to do that.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
|