|
Really. Your dates are interesting. Because when I went to work for a large health care service company in 2009 until 2018, I had to take a HIPAA exam every year; and none that verbiage was ever in those exams. So I will assume that your dated information (2003-2006) was changed somewhere along the line.
If anything, they kept tightening the regulations.
So I guess by your info, the company was just wasting money creating and forcing these exams on employees based on the current HIPAA regulations during that period just for fun.
You have any new info as of 2021 by any chance? Because I would like to see what they are now.
|
|
|
|
|
They're neither my dates nor my info. It was taken verbatim from a recent email from someone who deals with privacy and related issues as a business. None of it would surprise me, but I don't currently live in the US. The unauthorized disclosure of information would have applied to your job, but there's also the question of what's authorized. Do your own due diligence.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's see if I have this right. You used data from a RECENT email that contains information relating to 2003 and 2006 to make a statement as to the CURRENT HIPAA regulations to make your point. Remarkable.
My due diligence has nothing to do with the the current HIPAA regulations. It is dictated to those who work with the data.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Thank you for posting that. I had no idea.
|
|
|
|
|
You remove the Names, specific addresses, etc. Then it's just statistics.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Correct. One would HOPE they do that. But someone, some group, or process has to remove or transpose the critical HIPAA data. It should be automated and randomized.
|
|
|
|
|
Should you be accused of greed for trying to get a better job with more pay? A business has people to pay.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Better job, no. More pay, maybe. Where does it stop? That's why we have monopoly laws.
See below. It's called greed.
Google slammed for ‘monopoly power’ in new antitrust lawsuit from 35 states
[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange inferior work is easy (10)
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm,
Too easy, it required less effort to solve this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you know, couldn't be having a repeat of yesterday!
|
|
|
|
|
Answer it then
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I probably already did, just look again with your other eye.
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion ?
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBSTITUTE?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Nope...
Trying to make an easy clue is backfiring quickly
|
|
|
|
|
Effortless
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I got effortless from Randor 's comment, and see the "work is easy" and "less" bits; but why is "exchange" <-> "effort"?
|
|
|
|
|
Inferior clues for less, work for effort, and then you exchange them. Or so I figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's how I got it Derek
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
@musefan
Where's the CCC?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|