|
Message Removed
modified 15-Nov-19 16:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 15-Nov-19 16:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 15-Nov-19 16:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Richard. No dice on the UAC virtualization...not there either. A system wide search shows nothing.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
why not use process monitor to check whats happening
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you! I've used this tool before but for some reason didn't think to use it this time. I did use it but it didn't really help in this situation. (it was more a programmer (me) error) But, thanks anyway! Happy Weekend!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: The process is simple enough...download the zip file, unzip, and connect. Is this done via code, or are you doing it manually?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
It's done in code. The program shows a list of samples and the user selects the one they want to download and connect to. I can manually paste in the zip file (in between message boxes where I have it paused) and it works.
Process Monitor show the file getting created, but it never shows up in the folder. I've tried from a half-dozen folders/locations now with no luck. (thinking it might be a virtualization issue)
Never mind...I got it working. It was a missed ftp setting causing the problem. Apparently, either passive mode or proxy is important on VMs.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
modified 15-Nov-19 17:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
(and if I'm late to the party, enjoy it anyway)
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you push Donald Trump into a vat of concrete, would that set a president?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
and would it break his tweeter?
They call me different but the truth is they're all the same!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Tweeting from a vat of concrete? Yes, that will set a new precedent president.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's one way for him to get a statue of himself made.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen a statue of him.
: shudder :
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I've seen a statue of him. where's your proof? post the [proud] selfie or it didn't happen!
(and no photoshop fakery - we WILL be checking)
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't it spit him back out?
|
|
|
|
|
Careful ... getting close to politics in the lounge.
That's why I avoided the "bad precedent" joke in the original post.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
who says polly ticks?[^] is not allowed?
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer this one (WARNING: NSFW): [^]
politics: from poly (many) and ticks (little bloodsucking insects)
modified 15-Nov-19 21:20pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well it would certainly cement his reputation as the _ president ever!
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
In many cases, the team that works on a non-trivial software project includes:
- Project Manager (usually with no software engineering KSAs (1))
- Business Analyst, or "BA" (usually with no software engineering KSAs)
- Scrum Master (usually with no software engineering KSAs)
- Software engineer(s)
- Software developer(s)
- QA
I suggest, drawing on a lot of years of experience, actually doing this, and what I have studied over the years, that replacing the Project Manager, BA, and Scrum Master roles by having those duties for the project performed by a senior-level software engineer with the business, management, leadership, and people skills necessary (as well as hands-on coding) provides these benefits:
- Less overhead, and more resources focused on coding and testing.
- Less time spent in meetings.
- More reliance on expertise and less on the mediocrity of consensus.
- Less of a disconnect between what the customer wants and what is available to the customer.
- Higher quality of product in a shorter time.
- Higher maintainability and extensibility
A team of this design would retain the benefits of agile without becoming mired in the bureaucracy that plagues many agile teams and processes today.
Now it is your turn to comment. I realize that those who make their living from the agile bureaucracy would be in opposition. I wonder how those who actually create, write, and support the codebase might respond.
(1) KSA - Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
modified 15-Nov-19 11:17am.
|
|
|
|