|
Found this:
CSS Reference[^]
and this:
HTML attribute reference - HTML: Hypertext Markup Language | MDN[^]
But what I'd really like is reference where each element has a description of permitted attributes and styles. I mean, really, if I were writing a rendering engine (which I'm not) where is the gospel of what's permissible as an element's styles and how all these styles behave?
Actually, W3Schools has done a great job of making an interactive UI -- click on one of the style definitions, like "display", and you can see all the options and even how they behave. Still, I don't want to be clicking everywhere. Isn't there an actual document somewhere?
In my insufficient google-fu, I stumbled across something interesting but unrelated:
Custom Elements: defining new elements in HTML - HTML5 Rocks[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Start here: HTML 5.2: 3. Semantics, structure, and APIs of HTML documents[^]
The current spec has anchors to elements that an element inherits from so it's easier to search and browse in the page rather than in a search engine. It's not really authoritative though because browser and web developers do whatever they want, and that eventually gets reflected in the spec.
I don't know if there's anything quite as helpful for CSS rules, as far as I understand it there's some basic rules about defaults (block vs inline elements for example), but mostly that's decided by browsers.
CSS is much bigger, but I think you'd start here: CSS Snapshot 2018[^] (Links to all of the pages that I think you actually want)
Just remember:
Yoda: Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hah, I posted that earlier in the Insider News. (OK, maybe I'm looking for some hugs right now, otherwise there's not much point to saying that, haha.)
|
|
|
|
|
:hugs:
(I had actually posted this in Tuesday’s newsletter, so I guess I need hugs too. No one reads it anymore )
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: (I had actually posted this in Tuesday’s newsletter, so I guess I need hugs too. No one reads it anymore
Ah! I read it! I did a cursory scan but didn't go back to Tuesday.
:hug back:
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he should have used NOTNULL.
Not sure whether seven characters are allowed in a license plate.
|
|
|
|
|
In some states, yes. California and Arizona definitely.
California also allows some symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
Any states give you enough characters to have 'DROP TABLE'?
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not long enough for this one:
Speed camera SQL Injection : geek[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub - codewitch-honey-crisis/pck: The Parser Construction Kit ("Puck")[^]
Syntax highlighting for XBNF, PCK, C# and VB files.
Generates code and pcks.
still alpha, but stable enough anyway, for the most part.
it works as is, but is unfinished, yet cool
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
No API documentation (XML comments)?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
some of it. When the codebase gets more stable i'm going to finish it
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the meantime, here are the articles on the project that i have finished so far with more to come. And updates eventually. The latest code is always at Github
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5163943/Pck-The-Parser-Construction-Kit
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5164706/Pck-LALR-1-An-LR-parsing-algorithm
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5163845/Pck-FA-A-Regular-Expression-and-Finite-State-Engin
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure why, but I got to thinking about all the hunting trips my Dad and I did in Alaska, and got a hankering for lunch. Could not find any left over C-Rations, so made a fried Spam sammich and some canned peaches. a 20" rainbow trout or steelhead would have been nice, but alas, you cannot find those in Florida
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, navigate a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects! - Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the name says it all: Alas-ka
|
|
|
|
|
Brings to mind Alone[^] the only "reality" show worth watching -- largely because it is reality.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Sort of - except there were 5 to 10 of us, and we were generally driving a tracked surplus Army vehicle commonly called a 'Weasel'. But we sometimes used horses and pack animals, depending on where we were going (the area around Eureka was particularly interesting, as was the mountains behind and around the Matanuska glacier).
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, navigate a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects! - Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I have a word document for UAT procedures that has over a hundred tables, which have -- very professionally -- been set up with the same properties.
But now I have changed the page margins of the template, making the textarea a few pixels wider, so the width of the tables has to be changed from its current 670px to 100% (using a percentage means never having to change it again).
I've also introduced new paragraph styles for tables, which allow me to get rid of the (unstable-and-cause-other-problems) cell margins of the tables.
The Problem
When ms proudly introduced the next-to-useless, unwanted, annoying pop-up lollipops for adding rows and columns to tables (which, in the next update, they had to make optional, because damned-near everyone wanted to switch the damned things off!), they broke the option to select multiple tables, so I now have to go to each table, open its properties dialog, and make the changes to each table individually.
Well over an hour's work that would previously have taken less than three minutes.
{sigh}
At least this kind of thing doesn't happen with VS, because ms' own developers have to use it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's why we have macros.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Er, yeah.
It would take maybe three hours to research the word internals and create a macro for it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: It would take maybe three hours to research the word internals and create a macro for it.
...but we're developers--we'll spend weeks writing some code that'll avoid a repetitive 3-minute task...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry. I don't know what came over me, to have such a stupid thought.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|