|
More likely he'll crow about all the responses on the thread.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Him and his cockamamie ideas! He should give it a roost.
|
|
|
|
|
That's fowl play. If a coupé has four doors, it's not a coupé.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't matter, chicks still love it!
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
The chicken coup was an innovation too far ahead of it's time,
they had batteries even before people knew what to do with electricity.
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone knows that chickens prefer hatchbacks.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesh I can schlafli agree wilsh myschlafe thishl ishl the caycehl ... but I digreshl
|
|
|
|
|
He doesn't care feather you like this crop or not.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
And with chicks would it be a hatch back?
Someone's therapist knows all about you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ooooh, very tempted to give that a go.
One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think that's the guy who built my $50 Walmart guitar.
It is nice to see expert craftsmen.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I don't think that's the guy who built my $50 Walmart guitar.
No, I heard he's out painting the town red on his annual day off with the 25 cents (minus expenses) he indirectly earned from you.
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Even with all those modern tools it is a big thing... Nice work of a true craftsman...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
When I have an hour to spare....
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the announcement that Google was leaving PNaCl and incorporating WebAssembly I decided to read up on it a bit:
WebAssembly High-Level Goals - WebAssembly[^]
That lead me to this nice slide deck explaining asm.js:
Big Web App? Compile It![^]
That's a really great slide deck on the topic.
The really interesting slide in there says,
Kripken: JavaScript is standards-based and the only language that runs in all web browsers
Yes, it's obvious but also just seeing it like that is almost shocking to the system.
But, as I was going through that he mentions the vast number of libraries that are already written to convert code written in a language (Python, C/C++, Ruby, etc) to JS.
There are over 100 or more
I found this list : List of languages that compile to JS · jashkenas/coffeescript Wiki · GitHub[^]
The Point
Embrace Javascript, it is your future!
Or, maybe not. Forget JavaScript and embrace WebAssembly.
modified 12-Jun-17 9:07am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it bears repeating every time someone talks about WebAssembly and asm.js in the same post (because many folks are still hazy on it): they are two entirely different beasts.
WebAssembly is a binary (well, bytecode) distribution. asm.js is just a very strict subset of javascript (generally limited to the pieces that perform the best), but it is still javascript and runs through the browser's javascript engine.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. I noticed that too. The (asm.js-based) slide deck is just kind of nice because it walks through the overview of how the compile to js thing works.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: The Point
Embrace Javascript, it is your future!
Or, maybe not. Forget JavaScript and embrace WebAssembly.
Njet, tovarishch.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: But, as I was going through that he mentions the vast number of libraries that are already written to convert code written in a language (Python, C/C++, Ruby, etc) to JS.
There are over 100 or more
The Point
Embrace Javascript, it is your future!
Why embrace JS if I can keep using another language and hide the ugliness behind the converter?
Today I write in languages of my choice and absolutely don't care at all what assembly, meta or JS it compiles down to, haven't felt the need to embrace nor even glance at compiler output for 40 years now regardless what it is.
The Actual Point
As long as it works just keep on using whatever floats your boat.
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, you're right really. Some people still know assembly though, even though we _all_ use high level languages. People who understand JavaScript will be the geniuses of the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: Why embrace JS if I can keep using another language and hide the ugliness behind the converter?
Some of the ugliness does not go away this way.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
@User-10476399 I guess you are up tomorrow now...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Deja vu... did we not have this last week already?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|