|
These aren't the compilers we're looking for.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that, but you need to answer whatever is asked in an interview. you cant throw attitude atleast at that point of time (if you want the job).
dont mind brother.
|
|
|
|
|
That depends.Up to now they fortunately never wanted me to sing and dance.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be their problem, not mine
|
|
|
|
|
The nearby glassware would probably have something to say about your singing too.
|
|
|
|
|
Watch your mouth kid or you'll find yourself floating home.
|
|
|
|
|
And?
Did you solve them in time?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
yes i did, it took me a 25 minutes.
But i couldnot solve the part of the first question.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops.
You failed the interview then...
Better luck next time!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OG, whats your take on these questions?
|
|
|
|
|
Standard simple rubbish - it's a test of your thinking, rather than your abilities.
They are - sort of - a good idea, in that they show the interviewer how you work through a problem rather than the finished result, which can indicate how flexible and logical you are.
But generally? Waste of time unless they are done face to face, and then the time limit is irrelevant.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
thats true i agree to it. and one more thing, here there are a lot of walk in interviews. about 1000 people come to attend the interview.
So the strategy they adopt to cut off the mass is to put constraints/criteria which are baseless like:
1>You need to score a distinction through out your academics.
2>You field needs to be computer science.
and lot of such bull sh*t. So half of the crowd is cut off.
|
|
|
|
|
You've got to: even if you only give 1/2 hour per interview, 1000 of them is over sixty working days!
You have to cut it down to manageable numbers before you start interviews - that's what a CV / Resume is for!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
The first one is rather simple: took about 10 seconds to work that one out. Set fire to both ends.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
That fails the 15 min requirement
Why not just fold it into half (or quarters for 15 min) when it reaches the fold you're done
|
|
|
|
|
There is no 15 min requirement: 30 and 45.
For 45, cut it in half, burn one half, then burn the other from both ends.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
You're not allowed to cut it - by folding it into quarters you can get any multiple of 15 minutes up to 60 including 45
|
|
|
|
|
You don't need a tool to find the middle of the rope.
Set fire to one end. Once it has burnt to the middle set light to the other end.
45 mins.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have a tool to measure to the "middle" ... unless you mean wait for 30 min then set light to the other end.
|
|
|
|
|
If it't a rope, you don't need a tool to find the middle. Just fold it, then pull the ends apart a little bit so that it lies in the shape of a V.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
If you read some of the other posts, you'll note that this was disallowed: "Not allowed to fold the rope".
|
|
|
|
|
The only way this can be done with a single rope is either by exact measurement or proportions of the rope. Since you can neither measure it (no tools) nor find proportions (requires bending the rope) this cannot be done accurately.
However, if you have two ropes this may be possible:
Light both ends of one rope and one end of the second. When the first rope is fully burnt light the other end of the second rope.
|
|
|
|
|
Typical bullshit questions.
As for the rope, what are you allowed to do? Are you allowed to fold it in half?
The smilies are even more under-specified. What exactly are the moves you're allowed to use? "Use a combination of (2 + 1)" doesn't mean anything.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing that in the interview it wasn't in English, and it just doesn't translate well.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
It was in hindi, my native language. I am sorry couldnt translate that good.
|
|
|
|