|
So a colleague and I just bumped into the boss in Subway. He bought us lunch.
We are going to follow him wherever he goes at lunchtime from now on... 
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: We are going to follow him wherever he goes at lunchtime from now on
Next will be that call from HR for stalking your boss outside of work.  
|
|
|
|
|
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
|
You gave me so many good laughs.[^] 
I heard a year or two ago that somebody was in the progress of making a new Ghostbuster move. I wonder what happens to those plans now? Don't know if Harold was involved, though...
[EDIT] I just looked at Wikipedia[^], and it turns out that the list of the movies he has been involved with (one way or the other) is also somehow strangely enough the list of all the greatest movies I ever saw when I grew up... Bill Murray, don't you ever die! [/EDIT]
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 24-Feb-14 14:09pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The Ghostbusters rumour has been doing the rounds for years. Bill Murray flat out refused to do another one.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but I actually read it in a reputable movie magazine and there is a very non-informative entry on IMDB about it:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401[^]
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
It was in Empire magazine last year, and then the follow up was in saying that Bill Murray was still refusing.
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) R.I.P. a great performer
|
|
|
|
|
Animal house is a classic. 
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: Bill Murray, don't you ever die!
Don't watch Zombieland then....
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just about to post this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHBmShA8P28[^] when I saw your post... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually the perfect solutions. A zombie Bill Murray would be funny forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps someone can explain to me why?
Whenever I use intellisense auto completion, it shortens the namespace. For Example:
if the root namespace is: "MyCompany.MyProject.Foo"
Then generate code will appear: (note, I wrote the left-hand side of the equals)
MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject = new Bar.SomeObject();
This makes it such a PITA to refactor (move code around to a more appropriate place) Why not just use the fully qualified namespace? It is clear I have already made the choice not to use an include so why automatically assume brevity is the priority?
|
|
|
|
|
It does this if the opening parts of the namespace you're in match opening parts of the namespace you're referencing.
|
|
|
|
|
What Pete said, and I think it's prettier and better. So who's preference should win?
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, the overriding solution would be to make the right-side (generated) match the left side. Which would also solve the annoying feature of Intellisense chosing long and int over Int64 and Int32 which, when I use them, are for descriptive purposes. If you type something on the left, autocorrect should match it on the right, not pick a different version. The best intellisense uses the intelli to facilitate the programmer.
We are coming to a world where the choice is either capitulation to Intellisense or code in NotePad. The auto correct and intellisense is so burdensome now that I do indeed turn it off completely sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
You have a point. At least it should/could be a setting in options.
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: intellisense is so burdensome
Yeah, been there. Sometimes it's annoying.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: or code in NotePad
Notepad sucks. I rolled my own. 
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
Huh, never seen that, I always get the fully-qualified name... oh, that's right you probably have a using directive. 
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
No, if I comment out all of my using directives (and I only use using namespaces not aliases) I still get the exact same behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't that be
global::MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject MyObjectName = new global::MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject(); ?
Don't be too distracted by the prefix, but you forgot to give your variable a name. That's a syntax error.
OT; VS prefixes correctly if I remove it's using as PIEBALD suggested.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Mine doesn't. I guess my version of visual studio just wants to punish me.
|
|
|
|
|
Tequila.
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually have a couple of places where I use global::, but even I don't use it unless necessary.
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
