|
No one seems to know what a Senior Fire<b,w>all Engineer is, so, maybe, they are elves.
|
|
|
|
|
Back in the good old days - you know, the 1600s - "computer" was clearly defined as a person: one who calculates, a reckoner, one whose occupation is to make arithmetical calculations.
It seems these days (ie: 1897 and on) they'll randomly assign that term to any old bucket of bolts that can perform a mathematical or logical operation.
WTF indeed! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Before I got to be a Computer Programmer, I spent four years as a Mechanical Engineer. I've never understood why "engineer" got thrown into the mix.
I was happy with "programmer". And fine with "Software Developer". But no... "engineer" is a bit of a stretch. 
I'm with your dad on this.
modified 8-Jul-24 3:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
I vote for "code monkey".
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK a guy with a mastic gun can be called an engineer. One came to our house a few years ago to fix a leak on the roof of a conservatory his company had recently installed.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - the term has become very loose - too loose in my opinion. The word is regularly being appropriated - maybe to make someone appear smarter than they are (?) but I don't really know the reasoning. I have sat in meetings where attendees hand out business cards that say "Systems Engineer", and I ask them the standard small-talk questions, like "Where did you go to school?" and "What was your major?". Regarding their major, I've heard everything from "Business" to "Accounting" to "Marketing" to "Management". They often start squirming and come up with some justification saying, "Well, I've been around engineering and engineers for a long time." Yeah, I've been around doctors a long time, but you wouldn't want me doing your vasectomy. 
|
|
|
|
|
Related to the humorous aspect of this post, I have a friend who worked in the building industry in the UK mostly as a bricklayer. He told me he had a series of jobs working in crematoriums building the “ovens” with special fireproof bricks. I guess he’d qualify as a firewall engineer!
On a more serious note, I’ve said b4 on this forum, the use of the term “engineer” is highly regulated in most jurisdictions (I’m familiar with Canada, USA & UK). You cannot call yourself an engineer unless u have a recognized engineering degree & you have met the conditions to get a license to practice such as a P.Eng.(Canada), P.E.(US) or C.E.(UK) or similar elsewhere. If you call yourself an engineer without a license & you are reported, the relevant governing body (e.g. Professional Engineers Ontario where I live) will pursue you. It’s usually people like those who call themselves HVAC engineers who fix furnaces & A/C units that get in trouble but I have seen one or two cases where something similar to software engineer got someone in trouble. In most cases, the resolution is a warning to stop using the term engineer but I’ve seen cases where the courts fined those ignoring the warning.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 10415611 wrote: You cannot call yourself an engineer unless u have a recognized engineering degree & you have met the conditions to get a license to practice such as a P.Eng.(Canada), P.E.(US) or C.E.(UK)
Rather certain that in the US at least in some states you can in fact call yourself an 'engineer' but you cannot claim that you are a 'licensed engineer'.
But quite a few states require that hair stylists be licensed also. And getting that license also requires showing proficiency in the occupation.
|
|
|
|
|
Those of us who are Navy Nucs deal with this topic a lot. The academic depth and rigor of Naval Nuclear Power School, combined with the “hands on” training in prototype, lends itself to whether we are/were “engineers”.
When I worked as a control systems engineer with Barber-Colman, the PEs I associated with referred to me as an engineer, but not as a PE.
They relied on me for the theoretical, analytical, and operational information related to control systems (particularly computerized ones), mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, and computer systems engineering, without any criticism of me not being a PE.
I never represented myself to them as PE, explained I was a Navy Nuc with 2 years of college in chemistry and physics. Usually, they were sold at "Navy Nuc".
From https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engineer
engineer, noun, en.dʒɪˈnɪr
- a person whose job is to design or build machines, engines, or electrical equipment, or things such as roads, railways, or bridges, using scientific principles:
- a civil engineer
- a mechanical/structural engineer
- a software engineer
- a person whose job is to repair or control machines, engines, or electrical equipment:
- a computer engineer
- The engineer is coming to repair our phone tomorrow morning.
- a train driver
Professional Engineer
from https://www.nspe.org/resources/licensure/what-pe
To use the PE seal, engineers must complete several steps to ensure their competency.
- Earn a four-year degree in engineering from an accredited engineering program
- Pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam
- Complete four years of progressive engineering experience under a PE
- Pass the Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE) exam
Sticking to the actual meaning of the word “engineer”, those of us who design and build software using scientific principles are, indeed, engineers.
There is a good argument to be given in the context of software, that coders are not software engineers.
By being a “coder”, I do not mean a programmer who just mindlessly churns code out of some “stream of consciousness”. I mean it to primarily be one who thoughtfully writes code, uses design patterns and other “that’s how most everyone else does it” processes, rather than apply good engineering principles to develop according to a well-thought out plan that is flexible enough to accommodate changes along the way.
Being a coder seems to be the most prevalent with traditional HTML/CSS/JavaScript programming where the pressures of production, or the lack of interest in the engineering aspect of making web front ends, bypass the benefits of engineering. But I see it more and more on the backend, too.
In my experience, the application of value engineering is the most overlooked aspect of implementing software engineering.
Whether to work our software projects (or even just individual tickets) as engineers or coders is a choice. Engineering a project takes a little more time than coding, but the value returned from engineering is almost always noticeably greater over the full SDLC than just coding.
|
|
|
|
|
When I started working at IBM in 1979, my job title was Field Engineer.
I was neither an Engineer nor a landscaper.
At some point the Engineering community complained that non-Engineers were being called Engineers. IBM changed our title to Customer Service Representative.
As for Firewall Engineer, I agree. What the elephant?
Cheers,
Mike Fidler
"I intend to live forever - so far, so good." Steven Wright
"I almost had a psychic girlfriend but she left me before we met." Also Steven Wright
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Steven Wright yet again.
|
|
|
|
|
You all wanna hear something funny? My title is Associate Software Engineer. I just read this thread two days ago. About 10 minutes ago, my boss told me there is a reorg going on. My duties and salary will remain the same, but my title is changing to Developer I.
SOMEONE told my bosses about this discussion!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
what's your degree in? curious.
The boss has no clue. That crap goes way up in corporate HR. where there is no O2
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
My main mode of wheeled transportation involves a vehicle built and sold by Hyundai. I therefore subscribe to their "MyHyundai" service which allows me remote access to functions of the car from the comfort of my Android phone.
I pay about US$199 per year for that.
Now the app is telling me that I can't use it because I must first upgrade to the latest version of the app.
But the Google Play store tells me that the latest version of the app is not compatible with my phone. So I either upgrade my phone or I can't use the MyHyundai service at all.
This must be the kind of problem that you get when an application is created by code monkeys.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: created by code monkeys
That would be an improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you use MyHyundai services through a web site?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Well golly! I didn't think of that. They do have a website. I'll have to go there sometime soon and see.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Or designed by the sales team.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Or designed by the sales team.
But still implemented by monkeys! 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
We all know an infinite number of monkeys will eventually write the complete works of Shakespear, but the same can't be said for sales monkeys.
|
|
|
|
|
At least MyHyundai is not essential, we recently got a notice that our bank no longer supports our current android version and Google play said the latest version was not compatible with our phones. Then the network provider decided to discontinue 3g. And I was becoming pissed off with Samsung so new phones all round in our household.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
It could be considered essential.
One of the things I use it for is to lock the car remotely after it's been serviced because the technicians always park finished cars in their lots without locking them.
So I can make sure it's locked during that window of time of after it's finished and before I show up to get it.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
After two androids from two different manufacturers both received only one security/os update at year one, I finally caved and switched to iPhone.
This was a few years ago when there were lots of scary security issues that were not being patched for my device.
|
|
|
|
|
Has it occurred to you that you are about to get emails to buy a new car?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
My dad a few years ago was all gung-ho about Hyundai's BlueLink app, which let him get some data about his Palisade on his phone (he's not a smartphone guy). It didn't work. Even after a clean install, it always got stuck in a launch/crash/relaunch loop, and I could only get control of the phone back after a full reset. I told him clowns put the app together and the best he could do was to complain at the dealer to pass it on up and wait for a new version of the app. He ended up changing phones (LG -> Samsung), which did work. I guess Hyundai only tests with the most popular brand, even both ran the latest version of Android.
A few years later, he changed his Palisade for a newer year model. He was struggling again with the BlueLink app. It was still linked with his older vehicle, that he traded at the dealer. We could still track where it was, how much gas was left in the tank, turn on the engine remotely, etc.
Try as I might, I cannot find where to unlink from the existing car and link it with the new one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
