|
Searching for Teams in MS's Graph Explorer shows two entries, "Microsoft Teams" and "Microsoft Teams (beta)" (you may have to login first). I don't see anything promising under the first entry, but under beta, there's items such as "Get messages in a channel", "Get messages in a channel" and "Get replies to a message in channel".
If it's functional at all, it looks like it's possible...but you'll have to build it yourself. This is as far as I've taken it. I haven't looked into how to get the IDs it needs as params.
[Edit]
There's a "Get list members of a chat", which tells you it needs a chat ID, and also shows a link to get a list of chat IDs ("Get https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/chats/"). Running that seems to have returned a list of chats I've had with other people. Using date/time stamps, you should be able to find the chat ID you're looking for, and from there, I would imagine, find another API that takes in the chat ID.
Good luck...the fact that you can get the data piecemeal as JSON strings sounds intriguing to me. You may have a differing opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
record the session in a video?
You can't copy+paste parts of it, but you can at least re-read it offline, or use screenshots to make a pdf of it or try to OCR them
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw one group session turn on something called a transcript mode.
I'm sure there are a zillion ways of working around something this stupid, but most of us just use some other tool.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I really miss the old lync/Skype feature that would archive all chat logs into a folder in your email called “Conversation History”. That folder followed normal email retention policy. This would let you forward it to someone else.
|
|
|
|
|
You!
Not at you - I have been trying to remember the application where I could see a conversation or download the entire thing - and it was Skype. It's been like 2+ years since my client drank the Koolaid without thinking. Having done it in the past was tickling my brain. Yesterday, I was out in Outlook web interface searching for that feature. Of course, it's not there for Teams.
Yeah, my blood pressure just went up again.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I have wanted to do this - when I last looked, there was no way for it to be done. Even Lotus Sametime had the ability to copy / paste.
|
|
|
|
|
undermined jackass couple (8)
|
|
|
|
|
undermined
jackass BURRO
couple WED
BURROWED
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oops! I forgot to upvote the clue ... fixed.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Was it worthy?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So, it was an hallucinogenic spider this time, right?!
Which begs the question... Where do they come from?
|
|
|
|
|
Spiderpigs!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't remember the whole song Homer was singing.. but I was angling for that!
|
|
|
|
|
This one? Spider-Pig - The Simpsons - YouTube[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that one!
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, I just finished the movie and... yes, spiderpigs!
|
|
|
|
|
don't forget "The Batman"...versus say, just "Batman".
Spiderman, Batman, all the comic book movies need to just go away for 20 years or so.
|
|
|
|
|
Come on man, give them some slack..
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Spiderman, Batman, all the comic book movies need to just go away for 20 years or so. Amen! Can I get 30 years my brothers and sisters?!?! How about 40 years? Hallelujah!
|
|
|
|
|
I've been told/read multiple times that GCC will always inline template functions.
I use a ton of template functions in GFX for drawing operations, and I was deeply concerned that for example, my line drawing code (contained in a template function) was getting replicated for every line draw.
So I was going to wrap the calls in template structs, and then forward the template function calls to those. That was going to take a lot of time to refactor.
so before I did, i fired up the trusty Compiler Explorer[^] and ran this code:
#include <stdio.h>
template<int A,int B, int C> struct wrap {
static void abc() {
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
}
};
template<int A,int B, int C> void abc() {
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
printf("A+B+C = %d\r\n",A+B+C);
}
int main(int argc,char** argv) {
abc<1,0,0>();
abc<1,2,3>();
abc<1,0,0>();
abc<1,0,0>();
}
Come to find out, my information was bovine excrement. abc<1,0,0> does indeed get turned into a function, as long as the function is large enough.
Always
Check
Your
Assumptions
This has been a public service announcement.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Half a year from now: Proudly announce that the line drawing routine has been optimized and is now smaller than ever - not noticing it is getting in-lined.
One year from now: Proudly announce it works with the new version of GCC - not noticing some of the methods are now getting in-lined.
|
|
|
|
|
LOL
This is very true. In some ways, it would be nice if the standards dictated behavior in this regard, but on the other hand I think I understand why they don't.
However, if GCC starts being more aggressive about inlining even with -Os a whole lot of people who write for embedded and IoT are going to start complaining.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you use the inline specifier the compiler has the option to inline or create a function. This was added to the C++ spec in version 17.
|
|
|
|