|
TX6430 wrote: ...bad me... No, not bad! You introduced some to a great cover, even if Sander doesn't like it!
|
|
|
|
|
Good point , thx... SOTW, and CP, are great places...
|
|
|
|
|
TX6430 wrote: the latest Kataklysm There's really just one Kataklysm album I like, and that's probably more out of nostalgia than anything else, Serenity in Fire!
Going to check out their latest though, it's not that I dislike them or anything.
Listening to Enduring the Massacre, also good stuff, although I don't think they'll ever top Nothing Seems Right
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, "Nothing Seems Right" sets the mark very high - started paying attention to Dyscarnate after hearing this track on SOTW, then discovered "Enduring the Massacre" and found their performance really impressive ... - very uniform, high tempo, wonderful stuff. It is from 2010, and I think it overshadows their next album ... Until "With all might" of course ...
I will check "Serenity in Fire!", ik know only the latest 3 albums from Kataklysm. They are less uniform than Dyscarnate, but have some good moments ...
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
Because the first one went so quickly, although I don't think this will last long either...
Anger at reported failure to break at snooker (3,4)
It goes without saying
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure about others, but I gave it a try and failed.
What is the solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Red Mist
It goes without saying
|
|
|
|
|
FFS
I was trying to work with "miss" but it just didn't click. I should have spotted the "reportedly" indictor too as it's an obvious one.
I blame the impending weekend!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd thought it was based on the main one and was CUE LESS
|
|
|
|
|
No idea without this? (8)
It goes without saying
|
|
|
|
|
CLUELESS!
I like it!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That lasted all of nine minutes.
It goes without saying
|
|
|
|
|
It actually didn't last that long but I didn't want to post on Monday - Nice clue though
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
It appears that I now have 2 banks that DEMAND that for authentication I receive an SMS code that I enter into the webpage. However, my carrier, MagicJack, doesn't accept such shortcode SMS (I am using the MagicApp via LDPlayer emulator). And evidently, there are a lot of other carriers who don't as well.
|
|
|
|
|
2 Factor authentication is not a legal requirement anywhere I am aware of, but ... it's a needed requirement to comply with standards in (among other fields) the financial industry to combat fraud and money laundering. Basically, the banks are taking proactive action to ward off mandatory legal measures which might be even more restrictive (and expensive for banks to implement).
Get used to it: it's going to be more prevalent in future!
Either complain to your carrier and get them to fix it, or switch to one that does ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 1 then, and "why did you sign up to a four+ year contract? "
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Because a yearly subscription was $35, while a 5-year was $100.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a good saving, but that's a long contract period!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: That's a good saving, but that's a long contract period!
Yes, but at > $2/mo for phone service, it's a feature to have it for that long.
modified 4-Jun-21 19:39pm.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but SMS is just about as insecure as no MFA.
|
|
|
|
|
Because SMS is not encrypted end-to-end it's intrinsically insecure - but it's a better system than a password people write down in a book labeled "passwords" and leave lying around, given that most people cry like babies if separated from their mobile for more than 30 seconds or 2 meters, whichever comes first ...
At least the OTP's are short-time limited.
It's the "Something you are, Something you know, Something you have" paradigm at work.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Despicable. My US bank offers the options to either send an SMS or call your home phone and announce the code. My mobile lives in our vehicle in airplane mode, so I choose the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
My particular bank will give me a call, where I am to punch in the code that it displayed on the webpage. But the stupid automated phone call won't accept my keypad entry because it's MagicJack.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't follow. I thought your original post meant that the bank wants to send you an SMS. I believe MagicJack uses VoIP to provide voice calling. But SMS is like packet data. Trying to get an SMS on a regular phone would be kind of like trying to get a fax without a fax machine, so it's not surprising that it doesn't work.
What my bank does is make a regular voice call in which a synthesized voice announces the numbers in the code, after which I can type them into the login page.
|
|
|
|