|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Your remark has two likely interpretations:
You are clearly not very clever.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
The more accurate options are not KSS.
(they have implications of a very flexible back and neck)
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
ZurdoDev wrote: That was never really an issue in the US. because many people don't go to the hospital terrified for possible bills that can't pay?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: because many people don't go to the hospital terrified for possible bills that can't pay? Quite possibly.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
A friend from Finland told me that he can't wait for the 2 metres social distancing to end, so that they can go back to 5 metres social distancing.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Who's "they"?
Covid has all the hallmarks of a biological weapon, and behaves like one.
Explain me, how a virus is interested in your "character"?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Long story short - a hotel company fraudulently promised a service, and says that its website disclosed this. I didn't see it, and I am going to let them spend their lawyers' expensive time defending the complaint I will file with the NY Attorney-General.
Of course, now that the company has been alerted, the website has been changed.
|
|
|
|
|
They do not have to prove they were not fraudulent. You have to prove that they were.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
I have found their inaccurate description at the website of one of their marketers.
And I copied the webpage with the inaccurate listing.
|
|
|
|
|
Check the wayback machine if they're in it.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a brilliant way to lose a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
|
You should have archived it first. It's kinda your duty to gather "evidence", not the duty of the person you are accusing things of. "Hey there burglar, I have your fingerprints on the window ledge, do you mind not wiping them off until the police come and photograph them?"
|
|
|
|
|
Your own archive is rather meaningless as it could've been tampered with before submitting as evidence. As others have suggested, the Wayback Machine is a third-party with no vested interest, so it would probably carry more weight. Of course, IANAL.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh? What's the url of the Wayback Machine?
|
|
|
|
|
What happened? Is Google broken?
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to make sure we're thinking about the same site, why don't you let me know the url? I mean, there couldn't be some reason you don't want to, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly, you get what I intended to say. I think we both know why you're trying to twist things. I was just giving an example.
All I'm saying is don't think one person can provide his own evidence in a court case, because you always have to question where that evidence, which can be fabricated, is coming from. If anyone's serious after going someone else, you get others involved and follow the established procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
You seem quite reluctant to supply the url? Is there a reason?
|
|
|
|
|
There is no "reluctance" from my part. Here it is. You could've googled it yourself:
https://archive.org/
But now that you have it, we both know exactly what you're planning next just to try to prove a point. Go ahead. I eagerly await your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah so "The Wayback When Machine" is archive.org....gee, maybe that's why people say "archive it" rather than "use the Wayback When Machine"?
|
|
|
|
|
Why is that distinction so important to you?
|
|
|
|
|
Because that's obviously what I meant when I said "archive it" in my original post.
|
|
|
|
|
My whole point was that you don't make your own "archive" and hope to be able to submit that as evidence. You could fabricate anything by tampering with your so-called archive.
A snapshot of a web site (if that was your only evidence) would carry a lot more weight, IMO, if you could show that anyone can go to archive.org (a third-party with no vested interest in the outcome) and look up a snapshot of a given site as it existed on a random date--not your own creation that's been sitting in your possession for some amount of time.
And of course I fully realize there's probably a dozen ways you could still get the returned results forged along the way. But it gets a lot harder to fake that sort of thing, than your own files.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: My whole point was that you don't make your own "archive" and hope to be able to submit that as evidence
Which is a strawman argument as that's not what I was suggesting.
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: dandy72 wrote: My whole point was that you don't make your own "archive" and hope to be able to submit that as evidence
Which is a strawman argument as that's not what I was suggesting.
Well then pardon me for misunderstanding what you meant by:
You should have archived it first. It's kinda your duty to gather "evidence", not the duty of the person you are accusing things of.
|
|
|
|