|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Not sure my nutricionist agrees there
I'm quite sure they won't.
You want to fatten up, that's not always healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
What's the difference with normal chocolate cake? I don't see any at a quick glance.
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Make sure you eat a lot from fat, protein as well as starch, and best of all sugar, at the same time. From memory; sugar contains 5 cals/gram, fat 5,5 cals/gram, alcohol 7.
Protein contains the least. Idiotically, protein is the best option, since it doesn't just supply calories. Man needs a "complete" protein as building blocks, not just fuel.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: What's the difference with normal chocolate cake? I don't see any at a quick glance.
It's a failed cake, on purpose. It has a crusty caramelized outside, and an inside that reminds of chocolate sauce.
It's great served warm with vanilla or lemon ice cream.
But you can kiss your arteries good buy.
The reason you should eat a mix of protein, fat, starch and sugar is that the body only produces a certain amount of enzymes for each kind of nutrient, so if you want to gain weight you need to supply enough of them all to use up all your enzymes.
Except for sugar, sugar is always absorbed.
When it comes to alcohol it's not at all as efficient as one might believe, because it's mostly not absorbed by the body.
Highly simplified: Ethanol is converted in the liver to Acetaldehyde, which is a main hangover creator, which in its turn is converted to acetate, which leaves the body with the urine.
A side note, Methanol isn't that highly poisonous in itself, but it's converted in the liver to formaldehyde.
And the treatment is to saturate the liver with intravenous ethanol. Imagine that hangover.
|
|
|
|
|
Try a seven course meal: Kielbasa sandwich and a six-pack. Works for me.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: Kielbasa sandwich and a six-pack I'll vouch for its effectiveness.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not allowed beer; I get drunk on the third bottle.
So, bread with bratwurst? Add some sauerkraut to cut through the fat. That's my lazy-day meal, at least once a week. Without the beer.
More taste than a hot dog, more satisfaction than a hamburger. Good suggestion
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRHuff wrote: Oh to be 15 again! kg? lbs?
|
|
|
|
|
Lightyears.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last time I weighed in at 128 lbs was 40 years ago when I was 14 or 15.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: There's a little fat kid inside me, screaming to get out.
Mine got out...
And it is weird - we have been using metric in Canada since the early 70s but almost everybody knows their height and weight in Imperial - even my kids.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
As you get older you usually get fatter..
And the mechanism is simple, both your metabolism (resting energy usage) decrease and you appetite slightly increase...
"Problem" you have now, is your appetite is calibrated to your current weight and so it's going to be painful overeating...
However we have multiple appetites (there even was an interesting recent entry in new scientist about it) and modern snacks tends to confuse the brain into over eating, due to starving some appetite..
So my advice, eat a lot of unhealthy snack!
|
|
|
|
|
... where I was between 5 and 6.
Apparently "Kindergarten" was not an appropriate response.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - I needed that.
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra
"I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
|
|
|
|
|
I am aware that it might be dangerous to power sensitive electronics from an inverter that outputs a modified sine wave as opposed to a pure sine wave.
Does anyone do this? Is it harmful in practice or only in theory?
I'm interested to ask because I only have a regular inverter, and I will need to power my laptop on the road soon.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
modified 4-Jun-20 13:51pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you ready for this discussion to go off on a tangent? 'Cos I think it will.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's just rhetorical hyperbole!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quick, someone fetch a cosh!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Does anyone do this?
I've powered my laptops from a DC to AC converter that output a modified sine wave without any problems. Typically the inverters that you can get that plug into the lighter adapter of the car, but also I have a small solar battery charging system that I've used for a battery backup in the past, again, 12 VDC to 120 VAC and plug the laptop supply into that.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report, Marc. I have also used the modified sine wave to power the laptop in the past and did not notice any problems. But I was just wondering.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
From what I researched when I was looking at UPS'es a few years ago, some PSU's don't like it at all: because the "modified sine wave" is actually a non-symmetric square wave (or worse a "chopped" square wave) I made sure I bought a true sine wave UPS. Which failed far too quickly: the sine wave was fine, the batteries were fine, but when it switched over the 5V / 3.5V / whatever for the processor failed and it turned itself off ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Mr. Griff.
I'm sorry to hear that.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Chinese electronics ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I've run into this as well. The real issue with modern power supplies (and any in the last decade or so) is the switchover time.
|
|
|
|
|
A cheap inverter produce a square wave instead of a sine wave.
There are two problems with that.
A. A square wave produces harmonics really high up in frequency which, if badly filtered, can produce a high amount of interference with sensitive electronics. This can have very strange consequences.
2. In most switched power supplies, the input is first rectified and filtered through a capacitor to create a direct current
To produce the same power through a resistive load, the peak voltage of a sine wave is sqrt(2) higher than the peak voltage of a square wave. this means the voltage of the rectified direct current is 0.707 lower than the voltage from a square wave.
So for a switched power supply to create the same output voltage from a square wave as from a sine wave it uses 1.414 times higher current.
This is one reason brownouts break a lot of electric equipment.
So, I would take a good look at the power supply for how LOW voltage it accepts, if that is less than 0.707 of the nominal voltage of the inverter you don't need to worry to much I think, since switched power supplies are not very sensitive to higher harmonics.
Then there are some intermediate priced inverters producing something called modified sine wave, which is looking similar to a truncated triangle wave.
|
|
|
|