|
My wife and I had a discussion this morning about driver's high on pot in Illinois since it is legal here now.
|
|
|
|
|
It's illegal here, and they now have a roadside test for Coke and Pot. If you fail, it's down the station for a blood test to see if you are over the limit.
Yes: the UK has a "Legal limit" for illegal drugs ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Agree it's a generational thing, and will become widely adopted over time. Happens through a combination of better self-driving vehicles and acceptance by society that's (now) used to it. Remember how people used to value their private information? But, you grow up in a society where that's not valued, you don't know any different.
In terms of whether I'd trust it, depends. I believe in the power of technology to overcome complex problems--eventually. Agree also that it can become better than most drivers today (myself included of course--though I'm an excellent driver [Dustin Hoffman voice] )
The first many iterations, I'd want an attentive attendant ready to take over to (hopefully) avoid any more of the problems we've seen. I don't have a feel for how many real-world iterations we'd need until we could say, "yeah, this is safe enough and ready for production."
|
|
|
|
|
Eventually I will.
They will suss them out I am sure, and even if accidents do occur it will still be a lot less then the current idiots on the roads cause.
|
|
|
|
|
Might be. As a matter of fact, I trust more the self-driving metro than the human driven one.
|
|
|
|
|
Would you trust a self-signed certificate?
|
|
|
|
|
Given the sort of questions and sample code I see in QA, then no way.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you don't send them the codez they ask for, it's really your own fault!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Have you seen my code?
|
|
|
|
|
While I certainly enjoy manual driving, the move to self-driving vehicles simply has more pros than cons. Generations to either side of me are the worst drivers, so I want those safety risks removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Things I trust to drive a car in descending order of trust
Me
AI
Women
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: Me
AI
Women Anyone over 75 years old
Any male under 25 years old
Pedestrians I trust to behave in a predictable manner:
Me
Anyone who is not using a phone on the street
Senile, blind, drunk, and drugged people pushing zimmer frames
Anyone using a phone on the street
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Pedestrians I trust to behave in a predictable manner:
Me
Anyone who is not using a phone on the street
Senile, blind, drunk, and drugged people pushing zimmer frames
Anyone using a phone on the street Pedestrians I trust in the darkness of winter:
Me with free-hanging reflectors from both right and left pockets.
Anyone with free-hanging reflectors from both right and left pockets.
Anyone with reflector strips attached to their clothing.
Anyone carrying a lit flashlight/torch.
Anyone wearing a wristband with two tiny flashing LEDs.
Anyone without any sort of reflector or flashlight.
I can't possibly fathom how anyone who has been driving in a car, even as a passenger, in darkness along an unlit road would ever dare to walk it in the darkness without a reflector, in particular if there are no sidewalks. Yet it happens all the time (in spite of public campaigns every fall). To me, that is sort of a suicide attempt...
I wonder if these self-driving cars have been trained to recognize as a person a brigth flashing plastic tag, 10 cm across, easily noticed from 200 meters distance when the high beam of your car hits it.
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory xkcd which was proven in Iowa last week: xkcd: Voting Software[^]
Now imagine our actual lives depended on it...
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you asking me?
Ask my chauffeur.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
No, no.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
If all cars were suddenly self-driving, we might have a chance of making it work.
But as long as there's a mix of human drivers and self-driving cars on the same roads at the same time...the self-driving cars are in a difficult position to account for the stupidity of the human drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
This is my answer everytime I get asked the same.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get asked. I just butt into these random discussions with my opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
I do get asked... (working for car related companies for a while)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who wants an honest answer should be asking a software developer, not a car company.
(but then, if you work for one, you have the benefit of seeing it from both perspectives...and it sounds like you're agreeing with my response)
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: you have the benefit of seeing it from both perspectives... Not only that... I have tested a lot of different cars and have been a lot of time on the road.
dandy72 wrote: .and it sounds like you're agreeing with my response) I do. Although it has brought me a couple of discussions with co-workers just because I am realist and honest.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
not until all other cars are self driving cars.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe if they carved slots in the roads.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|