|
That article just gives a brief introduction to the Git workflow.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
I've been using both without much fuss, in VS2017, for a while now. I use the GitHub extension for Visual Studio to manage my GitHub projects.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
For the projects that are in Github what do you use to build and deploy them?
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
I use TeamCity for all my CI work. A client put me onto this and I love it's power.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
One of our developers mentioned TeamCity to me recently, and said it works smoother than Circle and Jenkins for .NET projects. At work are you 100% .NET? If so is that .NET or .NET Core?
|
|
|
|
|
I've used TeamCity before, and it's certainly one of the most flexible build management tools out there. It integrates with everything and is very easy to use.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
VSTS has service connections to multiple outside vendors / sources, including GitHub and GitHub Enterprise. You would use VSTS for CI / CD but the source code would be pulled out of GitHub. Alternatively, VSTS has native Git support, so you could move your repos to VSTS and still stay in Git (if that's an option).
|
|
|
|
|
That's useful to know
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please help us for the following-
1- We have cluster database server and one web server and we are using BizTalk 2016 standard edition to setup on production. so Is it mandatory to have BizTalk server 2016 Enterprise edition to use ? or BizTalk 2016 standard edition will work on server? Please suggest. Because I don’t want to purchase enterprise edition due to heavy cost.
2- On web server While doing setup the configuration of BizTalk server 2016 standard edition we are getting the following error log-"[Group] Failed to configure with error message [Exception of type 'System.EnterpriseServices.TransactionProxyException' was thrown.]", Can you please help what is the problem. some saying we have to install BizTalk 2016 Enterprise edition, starred edition will not work.
is that correct ? Please suggest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please read the text in red at the top of this page.
|
|
|
|
|
... seems to be the most complicated SW to write ...
... in the Universe ...
at least, the SW dev who wrote mine mapped the port from the USB (Thunderbolt hp) to the audio port instead of the thunderbolt (which is a big POS), and my computer just turned into a fire alarm because I tried to plug it to the docking station... Nah, everybody knows me now in the open space....
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: mapped the port from the USB (Thunderbolt hp) to the audio port instead of the thunderbolt
Sounds like something I would do on my last day...
|
|
|
|
|
The port mapping is obviously so you can hear the thunderbolt...can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder?
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like they already found a much simpler way to do that[^]. The kids love it.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, I like my Dino's scary & green! this feathers malarkey... Bread crums not so much...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals)object?
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Walt Fair, Jr. wrote: Why would PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals)object?
Them Animal huggers is funny people!
Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film. Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
2 million years of Homo Sapiens evolution has reached its peak. The only way is downhill from here.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Libera - Sanctus[^]
Found this song on my mom's phone when she asked me how she could play music on her new phone.
Everything about the music is cringe-worthy, the video, the kids singing it, probably the lyrics as well, except that it's just really beautiful.
It's really just Pachelbel's Canon in D in disguise, which also helps.
Anyway, I've been listening to an all-boy church choir for the entire week, so well deserved sound of the week
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. But needs something with more beat to follow it up. Maybe this[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Why am I not listening to Orbital more often?
I have four of their albums in the closet, mostly unplayed
|
|
|
|
|
Just too busy looking for new stuff, and working?
|
|
|
|
|
I meant like generally in my life for the last 10 years or so
It's probably because I like them, but they never had that one song that I like so much it makes me put on the entire album and listen to it.
And that's probably because when I came to know them I bought (and downloaded) like 10 to 20 albums each week, so it kind of got lost in the big pile of music.
Nowadays, I usually just listen to the old albums I already know, save for the few albums that really blow my mind (which are a couple a year), and tracks on YouTube.
|
|
|
|