|
|
Roger Wright wrote:
How often do you go through your cell phone Contacts, to delete the dead ones?
Dead as in no longer living, or dead as in you doubt the need to ever contact them again?
Either way, I clean house once or twice a year. Try to keep things relevant.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
???[^]
Not yet!
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
The End
|
|
|
|
|
Had to read through the entire thread before I realized that your use of the word 'dead' was meant in a literal sense and not metaphorical.
With the increase in inexpensive storage space, I only remove contacts which I can't remember any details about. If a person has passed away, they are still in there. If I look through the list and see their name, it is a reminder of the good times we shared.
Otherwise any contact I made over the course of my life or career might be useful down the line, even if I need to make an effort to track them down. On the other hand if it is a person that I don't wish to associate with any more, I move them to the blocked contact section instead.
|
|
|
|
|
As soon as I think of it - sometimes it's within hours or days. Certainly within a couple weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
Never...I don't own a cell phone.
|
|
|
|
|
Never. That's because I never add any in the first place. I have just 3 contacts, (wife, home, boss) and the phone won't answer to any call not in the contact list.
|
|
|
|
|
So, you're never going to answer if I call again?
You're still in my contact list, BTW, but I may have to delete you for not saving my number.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw this on Big Bang Theory. I've only had to delete one for a colleague since I didn't know her family and had no reason to call them.
|
|
|
|
|
So I took my favorite C64 game loaded it up in C64 emulator and captured ~1 minute of game play (frame by frame), then I ran captured sequence through an algorithm I've been working on and got this result
Though it's slow as hell, it took ~20 minutes to create this map
|
|
|
|
|
It would work better if you did not capture and encode a video. Instead, you could try to process each frame with the help of the graphics processor on the fly. And you could lower the frame rate to give it more time. Shirley you don't need so many almost identical frames.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
It's processing raw 4-bit video output from emulator, but it's slow largely due to hand written code for things like blur which is, needles to say, sub-optimal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Imgur a member of the Federation?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: imgurian
Hmmm... Not sure if I fit any of those categories
|
|
|
|
|
The link is rated NSFW at work but I grabbed the idea from the Google cache. I was not aware of that reputation of people from imgur, was merely refering to the fact that you had dropped your picture on it.
Nice work, BTW.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been working on a little dotnet core project that will allow users to create their own site and then post to it. It's really an interesting experiment so I can learn the underlying technologies -- and I've learned a ton so far.
Anyways, I just got my SSL Cert applied to my site so now it is secure for users :
https://NewLibre.com[^]
HTTPS & HTTP Still Work
The additionally interesting thing is that I updated the dotnet core site with the existing (and very limited prototype code) and everything is now working perfectly under HTTPS and still works under HTTP if the user selects that.
Cool VStudio Deployment
Mostly, I'm shocked that it still works. I'm also amazed at how easy VStudio 2017 and dotnet core make it to publish your web site. Serious CI and very cool. Also cool that you can test so easily on localhost:<port> then deploy to your prod site and it just works.
Well, I've recently posted in Weird & Wonderful about this site that will allow you to create a landing page (prototype) ==> The Weird and The Wonderful - dotnet core gen sub-web landing page[^]
And I've also written an article related to some other challenges I had:
DotNet Core 2.x Razor Pages: Using PartialViews[^]
And I documented a bug in Dotnet Core razor pages at : Why is my Model object always null on my Razor Page in dotnet core 2.x Razor Page app? - Stack Overflow[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the encouragment.
RickZeeland wrote: I also wonder if you are using a reverse proxy server for your website ?
I'm not sure what that is.
Are you wondering how I can pull the daily Dilbert comic to your landing page on the fly? --ie How I can pull remote content? Or something else?
|
|
|
|
|
You can read about it here: Web server implementations in ASP.NET Core | Microsoft Docs[^]
I found it interesting for our company as there are multiple SignalR projects in the pipeline and that way the developers don't have to implement HTTPS security themselves in their applications (we always struggle with certificates and stuff like that )
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. Thanks. I will take a look at that article.
EDIT
Oh, yes, interesting. On my main site I am not employing that at this time.
However, I have also deployed a test dotnet core web site to my DigitalOcean.com droplet (running Linux Debian). I want to soon try deploying this prototype to that environment but I had a heck of a time getting the sample running due to getting nginx (proxy) setup properly to expose it to the outside world.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm seeing a couple of 404 errors for your fallback scripts:
- https://newlibre.com/lib/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js
- https://newlibre.com/lib/bootstrap/dist/js/bootstrap.min.js
Firefox is displaying a "mixed content" warning, but I can't see what's causing it. Chrome, Edge and IE11 don't seem to have that problem.
(Edit: Now Firefox has stopped complaining about it as well. Weird.)
Did you have to pay for your certificate? Let's Encrypt[^] might have been a better option, especially if you could combine it with PKISharp/win-acme[^] to automate the renewals.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all that info.
Very nice.
I will check out those items.
I did pay for SSL cert but only $29 and then additional $24 for static IP which is required.
All hosted on smarterasp.net which is cheap and quite nice and allows direct deploy from VSTudio 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the issues is that it pulls the image from Dilbert.com and there is no SSL version of Dilbert.com.
This shows that warning/error in firefox about images:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/90Xeh.png[^]
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
congrats and a quick question ... :
did you encounter any problems with SignalR over https ?
I am asking because I could not make it (SignalR 2.2.3) work using (various types of)
self-signed certificates, no matter how hard I tried ...
|
|
|
|