|
No, not Dilbert of the Day, but could be. Instead I'm thinking the acronym stands for Drivel of the Day.
To be a client obsessed organization that boldly and continually reimagines the way we deliver value to our clients.
Now, if this was the alien costume designer for the next Star Trek movie, maybe I could go with it.
Latest Article - Contextual Data Explorer
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: that ... continually reimagines the way we deliver value to our clients.
Do the clients ever benefit from all this imaginary delivery?
For mine it sounds more like a nice way of saying "we sell them new bullshit every day on why we havn't delivered yet" (i.e. it's 'imagined' - nothing implies 'done.')
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah ... what he said.
It's like the expression "I'll be forever indebted to you" which really means "I'll never pay you back".
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds like a purveyor of spam and malware.
|
|
|
|
|
The adult entertainment industry motto .....
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, right, I remember having to do some UI testing when the company I worked for about fifteen years ago started to develop a Web interface for their "content delivery" business...
They always said the business was recession-proof, but I wonder whether or not they survived the Internet boom and access to free... content.
|
|
|
|
|
That really sounds like an article I read about rapid development recently.
Process went like this...
1. Company attempts to predict/makes a drunken guess about what new features their customers want
2. Develop new feature set
3. Push update to customers
4. Check use metrics and customer complaints about new feature set
5. Based on that info, either remove, redesign, or leave alone
6. Repeat from step 1.
Sounds like it only works if you have A) more money than you know what to do with and B) an inversely proportional level of knowledge about what your customers actually want.
See the upset about whatever image sharing application's recent redesign for the above concept in action.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: To be a client obsessed organization But when I'm "girlfriend obsessed" I get a restraining order
|
|
|
|
|
Is defeat where de shoes go?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And defile is where dey save debits.
Ad astra - both ways!
|
|
|
|
|
A sole-less comment laced with dark innuendos aggravating un-heeled wounds. How callous!
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ah... put a sock in it.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
No Defeat is what happens if you run over your feat with a lawnmower, with or without shoes.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
not people who cant hear having lunch?
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like you're speaking in tongues today, did someone lace your with something? Or did herself give you the boot for being such a loafer.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry man, I didn't mean to spur such feelings, I certainly don't want to plantar the seeds of discontent.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I should pull my socks up and quit whining - the shoe's on the other foot now!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone.
The question I aim to get clarifications about wraps some general notes on how to posit an ontopic subject for this community. The thread is the following: Tree game[]
As I'm a novice for a contributer, despite my oldership as a member, all what I know about this place that is meant to harbor source codes annexed to their detailed, well articulate explanations and substantiel sides that trigger wanders. For that i detailed as far I can, pointed out what the code is used for, strategies fallowed and etc, but depending on website appellation "code-project", I suggest that my contribution has likely reasons to be renounced for lacking well regulated hints and more snippets/parts that concern heuristics ? If so I would be really wishful and passioned to stretch my article with more texts and reinforce the coding profile.
Finally , I'd take this opportunity to thank you and this website for being a light guide rather more a source of inspiration for me during my previous course in CS. Any more guidance about syntax, grammar I'm pleased to get any such critics. Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
This is really the wrong place for this, but since it's here ...
The problem is that that isn't an article. And as I think I said when that appeared in moderation, there isn't anything there as is stands that makes it suitable for publication. There is no download, so talking - however briefly - about the code is a waste of time as we can't see it, much less run it or modify it.
All there is is a vague overview of the project, with no real detail at all - and we can't publish an article on the basis of "I'll make it better later" simply because most people don't come back and improve it!
Please, look at some of the existing articles here to get an idea of the standard we expect.
Here's one of mine: Using struct and class - what's that all about?[^]
And here's a tip which is a lot more "code focussed": Creating a Simple "scratch card" Control in WinForms[^]
We moderators aren't here to make your life difficult, or to be nasty - quite the reverse, we protect the site from not-ready articles, and authors from the derision and downvotes that poorer articles can receive. And to be a moderator, you have to write articles, so we know what it feels like when you slave away on something and Joe Moron from Stupidity High School, Kansas finds out it's not what he needs to hand in as his homework ...
If we let this though as it stands, it would - at best - be ignored, and more likely downvoted into oblivion.
I'm sure you have put a lot of effort into getting the code right, but we can't even see it to find out! And articles aren't just about the code: the words are what matters!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
[Sarcasm] Next you will want comments in the code. Sheesh[/Sarcasm]
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Your "article" isn't an article. It was rejected for a lack of content. Beyond that, there are more than a dozen articles that already discuss the "N-Queen" problem. Unless your approach is significantly different from one of those already-existing articles, what's the point in posting yet another article about it?
The bar for article acceptance really isn't all that high here.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, and i'm sorry if I made obsurity anywhere, It's a game that is a twist of 8 queens problem, and i thank you for protecting my thread from negative reviews, also, nothing is difficult more than making a serious willing for selfimprovement, and I take this challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: The bar for article acceptance really isn't all that high here.
Remember this one [^] FFS
|
|
|
|
|
A comment on your above post.
No small number of people on this are not native speakers of English. A paragraph full of rather verbose use of language just obscures your intent (unless that was, in fact, your intent).
Many of us here have substantial vocabularies - but the art of expressing oneself is, more than anything else, the art of making oneself understood (politicians obviously excepted).
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|