|
Congratulations, Mr. Grandpa!
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent news.
Can't believe how our lives changed when our first (and so far only!) grandchild was born. The joy she brings can't be measured - hope you get the same.
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
The End
|
|
|
|
|
Change? Without a doubt. Not the same as how the world changed upon becoming a parent.
The first grandchild, however, had a prelude of trepidation. After all, one is changing their position in society to "Grandparent" - and it is different with respect to implied mental/physical state. Suddenly, you're part of a different generation. Irrevocable.
However -the damage was done with the first.
At that point, pragmatic acceptance: I decided I may as well collect them.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
The End
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats
Grand kids are more fun, you can spoil them then give them back.
Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film. Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats!
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another childhood star gone.
|
|
|
|
|
I think he was a bit beyond childhood
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: I think he was a bit beyond childhood My Childhood
|
|
|
|
|
A straightforward one today, to blow away those weekend cobwebs:
Trainee takes Tom, Dick and Harry to a junction, and is locked up without a trial (10)
|
|
|
|
|
Trainee INTERN
takes Tom, Dick and Harry MEN
to a junction T
and is locked up without a trial
INTERNMENT
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Took you 8 minutes - you're getting slow!
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was at 7 minutes when I first saw it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on Chapter 4 of Practical Electronics For Makers and I'm working the reader through some very simple circuits so we can see how resistors affect (lower) current.
So I set up the simplest circuit that is simply a 3V battery supply and one 10 Ohm resistor.
Fist I calculate the expected current value I will see using Ohm's law (E = IR).
3V / 10 Ohm = 0.3A (300mA)
I hook up the circuit to run through my multimeter so I can measure (and confirm) the value.
My meter displays:
157.7 mA
What?
Google...
Apparently meters have their own internal resistance.
I decide to turn Ohm's law around and calculate internal resistance.
3V / 0.157 = 19.10 (Ohms)
So it looks like my meter has around 9-10 Ohms of its own resistance.
Hmmm...
Measuring the measurements of a measuring device.
Of, course if I had higher resistance in my circuit I'd probably not notice this, because it is only 10 Ohms.
I posted a question about this on electronics stack exchange where you can see pictures and the circuit.
Multimeter, measuring current calculates less. Can I calculate meter's internal resistance this way? - Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget the internal resistance of the battery or power source.
9-10 Ohms sounds like a bit much for the multimeter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next time you'll measure the voltage over the resistor.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you need a more accurate meter:
Fluke[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm weighing 500 gr of rice. I put the scale to 0, and put the bowl on the scale. What's that, it weighs 153 grams?
It's called calibrating, and your measuring-device should know how to compensate for its own interference.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You also need to know the sensitivity of measurement.
So while you may have zeroed your scale you will also need to know that the scale is, for example, accurate to within 1 gram.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
I'd assume the last digit on the scale to be a guess. That's still a lot less than the weight of the scale itself
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
And how is about to replace your 10 Ohm resistor by e.g. a 100 Ohm? Can you confirm with 100 Ohm your Observation?
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that is a great idea and will try that and let you know.
I also learned a bit more about this see : This thread the Lounge[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your Feedback.
Thinking again (and again and again ...) about this: In case you have a second multimeter available, I think the most easy Thing is to measure the voltage over the ammeter with the second meter. Having the current displayed by the ammeter and the voltage over the ammeter makes it easy too judge wheter the ammeter's internal shunt is the reason
I like your experiments and the articles.
Best regards
Bruno
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|