|
This is awesome![^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
A horse, a horse. My Kingdom for a horse!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
After two weeks of playing with a 3D printer, I finally have some useful results. This is a landing gear I have made for a 1/16 scale Seaking. The landing gear is going to be retractable and the model is going to fly, of course.
Constructing and printing a landing gear[^]
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Do the cut out circles in the flange add strength? Or are they cut out to reduce weight?
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
They reduce weight without sacrificing too much strength. You will find this all over an aircraft.[^] If you choose the right materials and profiles. you can have 70 - 90 percent of the strength at 30 - 50 percent of the weight. For the model they are too small to be really significant and it comes down to just mimicing the looks of the original.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Not to mention that the plastic of the model is massively thicker than the sheet ally of the real thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: massively thicker
When compared to scale, of course. That's also the reason why the bathtub sized Titanic does not sink when it collides with your Ducky. If the hull plates were made exactly to scale, they would be no more than tinfoil.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
If your Titanic was 1/16 scale do you really think it would fit in your bath?
I was wondering whether you could have made it out of thin alloy instead, much more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. 1/200 or even smaller, if you want to get in as well. For a helicopter 1/16 is about as small as I would like to go. The additional mass makes it more stable and very much less nervous in the air and you have a better ratio of the motor power to the heli's mass, compared to smaller models.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
How strong is the printed plastic?
|
|
|
|
|
I have printed tiles for a game plan from the same spool. The tiles are about a centimeter thick and mostly hollow (10% infill). Still I can step on them without any cracking.
Here are the numbers, if that helps you more: Polylactic Acid (PLA, Polylactide) :: MakeItFrom.com[^]
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds strong enough then!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you haven't seem my bath, have you!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Do the cut out circles in the flange add strength
Removing material never adds strength, but the edges of the cut outs are returned, so they add stiffness as well as the loss of material making it lighter.
|
|
|
|
|
It also reduces air-drag, which is significant at the velocities of the real thing. Plus: it does look cool.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Actually can make it worse.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. Do post pics of the finished model when done.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just glad I don't have to trust my life to a 3D-printed part.
|
|
|
|
|
Is that so? Last week our customer was here and we talked about how much they already rely on 3D printers. You should better not take a bus from now on, because that's what they build.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
As long as they aren't making the bus frame, engine, transmission, suspension, or any non-plastic piece of critical safety equipment from 3D printers, I would ride it.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much what I meant.
|
|
|
|
|
I often expect things to work and they don't so I thought I might mention a time when I did not expect a thing to work and it did.
I am changing my C'YaPass app so you can save the web site's password requirements along with your siteKey. That will mean the app will remmeber each sites's pwd requirements like Yahoo!, for example, requires uppercase, max length of 32 and 1 special char.
Anyways, currently the SiteKey objects are simply stored in a json file (serialized) and then deserialized when the program loads. Very simple.
However, to do the new work it means the SiteKey object and the json behind it would be different. I'm adding new property values to the SiteKey class.
I figured that was going to be very difficult since the new app would expect the new property values that obviously weren't there.
However, I found that the NewtonSoft Deserializer handles all that behind the scenes.
1. It simply reads the old json and deserializes the old json into my new objects (which contain new properties)
2. serializes the objects back out with default values where the user has not provided the values yet
Very cool, Newtonsoft!
|
|
|
|
|
I Json.NET ! Been using it in both .NET backend code and my Xamarin.Android client.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Json.NET is probably the best JSON serializer I have ever used. It can handle pretty much anything thrown at it, and is rather foolproof. Any exception thrown by it also has a descriptive message.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|