|
If you're going to make an unfathomable comment you like made to ppolymorph, you deserve to get smacked. It doesn't matter what the rep points are.
If OrignalGriff made the same comment you did I would have smacked him too.
|
|
|
|
|
Good!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: unfathomable comment you like made to ppolymorph
Sorry the "unfathomable" answer was given by him! And sorry such a generall answer given by me will end in endless downvotes!
About the remaining "Of OrignalGriff made ...", it is your Statement, I can only hope it would be the truth, what I have to assume.
|
|
|
|
|
Quit while you are (just) ahead. Much more of this and the anti-troll hamsters will be unleashed.
|
|
|
|
|
I have low rep, but I've never really been on the receiving end of (truly) negative treatment in any area of the forums (and I've definitely said some stupid sh*t!) At least not to the level that would make me feel unwelcome.
My perspective is that the higher rep people here are actually rather nice, level-headed people; a stark contrast to most of the rest of the internet.
Maybe it's related to username? (Wouldn't that be an interesting psychology study?) That name on my account is indeed mine; for whatever reason (I genuinely don't know) I don't feel the need to hide behind a pseudonym here (and certainly do almost everywhere else.) Maybe that helps to humanize me, which leads to more humane treatment...
Then again, there are also certain people here who seem to be bigger a-holes than the rest (not naming names!,) so maybe I've just been lucky to not have interacted with them.
|
|
|
|
|
At last, I now (maybe) understand how and when to use the term chickenshit.
|
|
|
|
|
You are completely right. If a new person would have posted this same message many would have suggested it go to the soapbox. High rep members are definitely favored, or perhaps just trusted more.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: High rep members are definitely favored, or perhaps just trusted more.
As it should be. In fact, I was thinking CP should erect a virtual sacrificial alter to the high rep users, and every Friday, we select a low-rep user to eviscerate in full view of the masses, simply to ensure they know not to f*ck with us.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
How quickly we forget we were all new once.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never been "new".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
If you're not the first to shoot it who will be?
Is it possible your father intended to give it to you when you become a man?
::ducking::
|
|
|
|
|
Your choice really.
Do you care about its monetary value or not. Being the first to shoot it has a value aswell, for you. It might be the best gun you ever tried.
Only one way to find out.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say that for me it would depend mostly on why your father never fired it.
If he had a reason, then it might be respecting his memory best to honour that and not fire it yourself?
Please accept my condolences by the way - I remember your efforts to build his submarine model for him.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I think he simply never got around to it, and he generally forgot he even had the gun.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
My co-worker has found a M1 Grand after his father died. Police took it for destruction, as automatic weapons are banned.
|
|
|
|
|
That's just wrong on so many levels. And besides, the Garand is not "automatic", it's "semi-automatic", requiring one pull of the trigger for every round fired. It was fed by a top-loaded five-round clip (not a magazine) that was ejected with an audible "ding" sound when empty. It was chambered in 30-06, and accurate out to about 500 yards.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
The version used at WWII had 8 round clips (a block with two rows of 4)...Even today a very accurate gun...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: the Garand is not "automatic", it's "semi-automatic", requiring one pull of the trigger for every round fired.
Ah, so that's the difference. I've always wondered about this but never asked nor googled
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. That's why people (okay, I meant to say liberal commie bastards, but I was trying to be sensitive) saying an AR-15 is so "dangerous" because it's an "automatic". Same deal, one trigger pull, one shot.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, don't think they'd be commies....historically the commies have always like their firearms for all those executions of imperialist capitalist types and armed insurgencies and the like.
Liberals probably, bastards definitely.
If your neighbours don't listen to The Ramones, turn it up real loud so they can.
“We didn't have a positive song until we wrote 'Now I Wanna Sniff Some Glue!'” ― Dee Dee Ramone
"The Democrats want my guns and the Republicans want my porno mags and I ain't giving up either" - Joey Ramone
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Same deal, one trigger pull, one shot.
Now, I'm not too familiar with the AR-15, but with the old Nato 762 SLR, I could fix that with 5 seconds and a matchstick.* I wouldn't be surprised if the AR was not much different.
* It took a little longer, and more than a matchstick, to get the damn thing to stop firing when you took your finger off the trigger.
|
|
|
|
|
You have to drill another hole in the receiver and use a different sear. A matchstick won't do it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Americans and their guns...
Anyway, condolences.
Now raise your American flag, sing The Star-Spangled Banner, and shoot that gun*!
* Bonus points for hitting terrorists or Mexicans.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Liberals, avert your eyes - I'm gonna be talking about guns.
What a very odd view of people you have. One can be an admirer of the craftsmanship involved in armaments without being required to think they should be freely available to any idiot to leave around the house or wave in the face of anyone who spills a bit of coffee on their shoes just because.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome weapon, definitely a keep sake.
I saw on another site it was chambered 30-30...
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|