|
Yes, they're very seedy.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
All Apple's products are fruitless, so I guess no?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what this thought stem's from but it doesn't appeel to me.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
You're all stalk, old fruit!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
They'll just Cook something up
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, he is the decider.
|
|
|
|
|
Of cores
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
How far apart would two earth-based telescopes have to be in order for their (CCD video) images of the moon to be combinable into a stereoscopic image?
(specifically would 320km be enough?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even less if you're not aiming at human viewers.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, give or take two inches. Good call.
|
|
|
|
|
Given that the moon is 15,133,979,520 inches away there won't be much of a difference between the two images.
As that is 384,000 km, then even a separation of 300km doesn't look like it will make much difference - 3000 may be more the required distance so this moon shot is cancelled.
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: there won't be much of a difference between the two images.
Not my concern.
|
|
|
|
|
According to this stereoscopic guide, you would need to place the cameras 12,813km apart (if I'm reading correctly).
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
|
|
|
|
|
Going by the 1/30 rule - you are correct. All that is required is to have two cameras on opposite sides of the Earth. The problem is that for both cameras - the Moon will be on the horizon, which will distort the images.
Using two satellites in the same orbit but 180 degrees apart would solve the horizon problem.
Perhaps we can interest Elon Musk in the project?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Foothill wrote: if I'm reading correctly
You're not! The 1/30 rule gives you the distance of the nearest object that you can successfully photograph stereoscopically given the separation of the cameras. It's not intended to work in reverse to calculate the separation of the cameras given the distance of the object you're photographing. And really it should only take a second's thought to realise why that is, namely that the whole point of stereoscopic photography is to provide the appropriate depth to objects at a variety of distances. If the separation of the cameras had to be proportionate to the distance to the object you would have to capture multiple images with the cameras at different separations!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
moved to soapbox
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
modified 2-Feb-16 10:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
Soapbox! Soapbox!
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
Just found this gem in a question about a Socket Exeption:
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (serverStarted)
{
updateUI("server is already started silly sausage");
return;
}
if (radioButton1.Checked)
{
startScan();
}
else
{
connectAsServer();
}
}
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very serious about my sausages!
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
I think it shows poor form to bring the QA into the Lounge, for any reason, really.
|
|
|
|
|
The clue was:
Queue to the left, but pee to the right! (8)
And the answer: KEYBOARD
Guess that means I'm up again tomorrow...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What a quipster!
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
QWERT(Z/Y) my friend
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
And AZERTYUIOP in France as well.
But most keyboards are QWERTY - it's the most popular in the world despite there being "better" alternatives such as Dvorak.
And I liked it!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|