|
I have never once had a software licence agreement throw a frying pan at me.
|
|
|
|
|
Beware!!! She's about... with frying pan in hand.
Run!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, you can be right or you can be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 23-Jan-16 21:33pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 23-Jan-16 21:33pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 23-Jan-16 21:33pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, that was extremely fast to get my article reviewed and available.
Thanks to all.
|
|
|
|
|
Next time, don't do this.
Newly submitted articles how up in the queue of everyone who can review and approve. It takes multiple votes (and time) to get that to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
I will never do that again. Thanks for letting me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I bet the price remains the same... :CynicalOldFartSmiley:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No, to maintain the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, when size shrinks, prices increase.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Ah! Schrödinger's Consumer!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No, that's the certainty principle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So?[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
About time: he took the show back to being a silly kid's program. Not nearly as watchable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with being rich. Rich is not a crime. Rich is not something to be ashamed of. Rich is not something to be fined for or penalized for.
However, Socialist pigs and bleeding heart liberals think there is something wrong with being rich and they play the poor card, every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: There is nothing wrong with being rich.
Yeah, there is! It takes money out of the economy. Economics 101 - the health of any economy depends on the free and continual circulation of money from consumer to producer to employee. Any long term diminishment of the money supply, from excessive imports to excessive saving, is damaging to the economy. Any damage to the economy will, by definition, affect the poorest first and most enduringly. If by 'rich' we mean those that hoard wealth, and we surely do since nobody gets on the rich list by having outgoings commensurate with their income, then there is absolutely no doubt that they are damaging the economy to which they are in a parasitical relationship. One does not need to be a socialist or a liberal to simply do the math!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
9082365 wrote: It takes money out of the economy.
Nothing compared to how much money the nanny state takes out of the economy. Don't be ridiculous.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Nothing compared to how much money the nanny state takes out of the economy The state spends that money again within a short timeframe. Most rich peoples' billions just sit there on a bank account.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|