|
|
|
A classic for sure.
I'm gonna have to re-watch that movie at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
I am thankful for our troops, but I often think of this song regarding the consequences of war.
Bob Dylan - John Brown - YouTube[^]
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
True, as is Bob Dylan - Blowin' in the Wind (Official Audio) - YouTube[^], sadly.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
But the troops have been sent there and have to survive and have little opportunity to think about a Bob Dylan song 
I am ashamed that others risk their lives for 'me'.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, they've been sent in harms way unfortunately, a time when this is unnecessary, it seems is a delusional thought.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
"Me" in quotes is right, because they risk their lives for deranged neocons, something that has long been bipartisan.
|
|
|
|
|
'They' risk/spend their lives in ww2 when I was not yet alive. And I thank all of them 
|
|
|
|
|
True, though WW2 likely wouldn't have occurred if the US hadn't intervened in WW1, tipped a stalemate to the Allies, who imposed draconian war reparations on Germany, leading to the Weimar hyperinflation and the rise of Hitler.
|
|
|
|
|
do not be ashamed. you misunderstand being blessed.
There are men who go into dark places and make the evil fear, and for sure there is evil. And the evil needs to be put down.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Where do I enlist? Catchy Tune. Must investigate AC/DC.
|
|
|
|
|
Non native English at that side, please elaborate 
|
|
|
|
|
Your English seems fine.
AC/DC is Australian. I assume their English is swell mate.
The site is by a Ukrainian. I do not know his English proficiency.
"that side"? What side is that?
As for elaboration I can only assume "Where do I enlist?" may be of some confusion. It asks where do I sign up to the military so I can fly those fantastic machines just like Tom Cruise does.
|
|
|
|
|
Too close for comfort / home...
I am a victim of 1968 Russian aggression , and I prefer NOT to say more...
so for you AI hard of hearing - do not ask...or elaborate (instruction)
I am a firm believer of right to have a personal opinions, however , I find the post
not only inappropriate, but objectionable.
This site would not allow post of DEAD children resulting in ANY usage of such hardware ,
irregardless if friend or foe.
<b>You CAN have your views or options, but I do question your values</b>.
|
|
|
|
|
1. Dont' give me instructions!
2. You are not a victim! Most probably your parent where.
I question your values too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which part of the Do Not Copy setting do you (or I) not understand?! Does it not apply to web.config files? 
</rant>
Thank you, I feel better now. As you were.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
No, it doesn't, because it's an integral part of the ASP.NET framework. The thing no workie without it.
|
|
|
|
|
Correct, but I do not need it to overwrite the copy in production with the copy on my development machine, even if there are changes.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so that's Publishing the app. Click on the file once in Solution Explorer and change the "Build Type" from "Content" to "None" and change "Copy to output Directory" to "Do not copy".
If that doesn't do it for you, there's another way to exclude files from the Publish, described at Excluding Files and Folders from Deployment | Microsoft Learn[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Software is a product.
Much like TV, automobile, washing machine, etc.
The latter are tangible while software is intangible but that is not an important difference.
Once upon a time, when you bought a software, you paid one price for it, no matter how many persons in the purchaser company used it.
Then they decided to charge according to the power of the processor the purchaser company used. This is like saying you have a larger living room and so the TV is higher priced.
Then they decided to charge price/user. This is akin to the price of the TV or washing machine being dependent on how many persons are in the household.
Now, Oracle has gone one step further and its Java licenses are based on the number of employees in the purchaser company, including janitors or messenger boys they may employ. If a customer refuses to accept the new terms, which yield hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars more in revenue to Oracle, Oracle is threatening an audit of those companies to determine if any of the contractual terms are violated by the purchaser. Companies have sprung up to assist the purchasers in questioning the findings of these audits.
What makes software different from common household goods such as TV, automobiles, etc?
What justifies differential pricing based on number of users?
Other than the greed of software vendors.
|
|
|
|
|
Thankfully it only applies to Oracle OpenJDK, which is essentially Standard Edition. I'd be surprised if any large companies continue to use it, at my last place I had a migration task to move all JDK installations from SE to the Adoptium OpenJDK versions. Took me all of about a day and probably saved the company a lot of money since the company was international and had a lot of employees. I suppose the only companies interested would be those specifically wanting the Oracle support, but is it worth the cost? I don't think so.
Some other platforms do similar things where they charge different models based on the size of your business, either by the number of employees or the average annual revenue.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
AC/DC is timeless ...