|
Thanks everyone for your response.
Ravi Khoda
modified 12-May-15 4:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
These kind of questions are generally not accepted on CP, but I'll give you a hint nevertheless.
Search for a book about "Hacking" and some knowledge will be "Exposed"!
Use this knowledge responsibly. There is a full tool stack explained in that book to find security flaws in your systems.
Some of these tools are used by a big company to make their systems safer from hacking attempts.
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
modified 12-May-15 3:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
Employ an ethical hacker, companies are out their who will run penetration tests on your site and produce detailed reports on any and all vulnerabilities.
either that or get trained as an Ethical hacker
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Well there are Tools with that you can run several "hacks". Unfortunately you have to find them by your self. The problem with such Question is, that (As you will learn if you choose to become a white head or penetration testing hacker) information about this topic is not easy to provide. In most countries the one who taught you is responsible for the mess you made, that's why you have to sign a paper that reliefs him from this responsibility.
I recommend you to get a quick course for "Hacking" and read a book to that, finally you should learn some techniques to think of what could possibly be attacked and how. Then find (create) the code, most "Hacking" is a craft of creativity.
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Metasploit is a good tool for pen testing:
https://www.metasploit.com/[^]
NOTE: If you do not own the server - you better make sure you notify whoever does BEFORE you unleash this tool on the site you want pen tested.
|
|
|
|
|
Is the machine hosting your site turned on?
If it is, then yeah, it can probably be hacked in one way or another.
But seriously, you can only look for things you know about. Your question is so vague, this might as well be the only accurate answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't feel too bad, kid. It would have taken me two weeks to find the error.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry. We feel like you're an idiot too
|
|
|
|
|
have you checked Q&A there are usually a few Idiots there and I am sure no one would object in you taking one
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I know someone who owns a sports bar with 20 TV's. He wants me to build a tablet app that can control all the TV's.. Seems like the device would need to transmit and be able to pair with the TV.
Anyone know of any way to do this?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Are the TVs all the same manufacturer, make and model?
Are they SmartTVs?
Are they all connected to the LAN per WiFi or cable?
For most SmartTVs there are already apps out there to control them.
Sniffing the packets transmitted over the network with WireShark may shed some light on how the protocol works, but I'd try to get information from the manufacturer beforehand. My experience is that you'll have to pair the device with your TV(s) so that would have to be done too.
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO you should start with a simple Google search and read a few of the articles to start with...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
if budget allows I would rather go for some "control server" where the app connects too.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't they already have universal remotes for that? I think they do.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the situation. I have some nice icons for various audio files that look a hell of a lot better than the stupid orange-striped traffic cone for VideoLan, which have 4 sizes associated with them when opening them in Greenfish Icon Editor. It used to be that in these particular views, the 16x16 icon would be displayed, which is what I want, as the the larger icons aren't so good when small, even though they are great when large. However, now the 32x32 icon is displayed, which I don't want.
I think I know why this is happening - I recently set the Control Panel Display - Screen Resolution to 125%. (I would go back and reset it just to prove that I'm right, but I don't feel like going through a pair of reboots.) Short of updating each of the icon files so that the 16x16 icon is blown up by x 2 (which would be a bit of a pain in the a33), I can't figure how to do this.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
You can get assistance with this by:
1. reading the pinned message at the top of the Lounge: "Posting rules for The Lounge [modified] Pin"
2. deleting this inappropriate question
3. reposting your question on one of the QA forums here with:
a. imore details about the context in which you have this problem: what type of Application ? WinForms ? Web ? WPF ? Android ?
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a programming question! There have been more prominent members of CP "abusing" the Lounge before without being chastisized. So get off of his back, will ya!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Manfred, given the often satirical/mocking responses to questions like this on the Lounge, I thought I was doing the OP a favor by suggesting they repost on QA.
But, if I did a dis-service to the OP, I apologize.
And, yes, of course you are right about the fact that some folks can post certain types of content on the Lounge and get serious responses/discussions, whereas others posting the same types of content can get dumped on.
I am not sure if it's a sign of wisdom or just a fungus-of-blase-indifference to the inherent injustice of social groups [1] growing on my aging soul that this doesn't bother me
cheers, Bill
[1] The school of psychotherapy I once trained in, and was certified in, Psychodrama, was invented by J.L. Moreno, a fascinating character who was both dramaturge, technical inventor, artist, poet, social scientist. Moreno believed that human social groups were innately "unjust" in that the perceived authority to regulate and shape interaction ... bottom-line: who gets paid attention to ... tended to become concentrated in a few individuals or dyads.
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind reposting somewhere else, but I don't see a forum for general "how to use a computer" questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that one helps prove their point.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I call Blasphemous Rumours!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|