|
You can't steel that much! You need to be a lawyer to do that.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
A man can dream, can't he?
I'll call Saul...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, but man's grasp should exceed his reach...
[with apologies to Robert Browning]
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
You develop the duty-collection-component and I'll not only send you for safe keeping but gift you all duties collected from customers from Wales. Deal?
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly not - I'm not convinced the labour / reward distribution is quite equitable...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You should be a bit more trusting towards your fellow CPians
|
|
|
|
|
Trust is wonderful; but business is business!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. It is called a convenience fee. Every organization charges it and so should you.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: It is called a convenience fee. That's actually a good hint, thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Which duties? Household or civil?
|
|
|
|
|
customs
|
|
|
|
|
and conscription
Life's like a nose, you've got to get out of it whats in it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon RDS [^]
Does anyone here have any experience of this service? Is it good/bad; easy to setup/use? I'm particularly interested in backups - if you've needed to restore was that a smooth process?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like something I might see in Skyrim.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
And it has dragons too! You'll never see me outside in the real world again
|
|
|
|
|
Nice
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I suppose I'm making a little progress. I was harshly introduced to bundleconfig.cs over the weekend while fighting with the jquery-ui datepicker, and I think I have a grasp on the model/vew/controller interrelationship. Fortunately, I don't have to deal with anything really scary in this project (as far as I can tell).
I still am not a fan or advocate of web development.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
you branching out into lighting?
http://www.phi-lighting.com/product/vew/[^]
which flavour of MVC are you on as the way bundles work changes between 4 and 5
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using MVC5.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
be thankful then as MVC 4 version was a nightmare
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Well then - not much has changed, evidently.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I've avoided MVC these past years because I thought it was just another 'pattern du jour' but I guess it's not going away so I've been learning it slowly when I can.
The best, easiest example I've found of using MVC so far has been the CodeIgniter[^] framework. Even if you never intend to use PHP with CodeIgniter, it makes the whole concept so easy and simple that you wonder what took you so long to use MVC
|
|
|
|
|
DaveX86 wrote: I've avoided MVC these past years because I thought it was just another 'pattern du jour' but I guess it's not going away so I've been learning it slowly when I can.
As a concept, it makes sense. Forcing an implementation down my throat doesn't make sense because quite frankly, sometimes MVC is simply best as just an organizational concept rather than a law by which every view MUST have a controller, every transfer of data from the database to the client MUST go through a model (especially when transforming a DataTable to JSON is a one-liner with NewtonSoft) and vice-versa, etc...
MVC, like MVVM is a great guideline, but the religiosity of it I can leave behind.
Marc
|
|
|
|