|
The source control component in TFS is fine. But the agile components via a browser suck ass.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't aware people actually used that, other than bloggers who try to convince others they should.
|
|
|
|
|
Who designed this UI? Total unintuitive.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
I spent forever trying to figure out how to navigate to a specific area of the backlog. Finally I asked someone and the showed me the clear-as-mud link thingy at the top that drops down the list thingy.
Why would they not use a hierarchical format, like maybe a collapsible tree on the left??
Then, in the Kanban board - the BLI's don't show their number, so when I'm given task "BLI #1234", I have to type the number into search just to find it.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, thanks!
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
JMK-NI wrote: total shambles
Just the UI?
|
|
|
|
|
The most amazing part to me is on backlog pages, even though the UI seems to indicate you can sort the column (it goes gray shaded), you cannot sort AT ALL.
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever I see things like "[summat] on-line", "as a service", or "cloud-based", I tend to turn and walk the other way.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Weird. I've never had a problem with it.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the same people who designed the on-prem version. It is totally counter-intuitive and takes forever to find simple stuff. Having come from a job where I used the Atlassian suite (Jira, Bamboo etc) I've found the TFS suite to be torture. Sadly the group I joined have been using it so long something akin to Stockholm syndrome has taken root. You can show them how much better the experience could be using different tools but they get a panicked look and say "but it's not Microsoft". Don't get me wrong, I like C# and Visual Studio but their ALM suite is stuck in the early 2000s when RTC was the biggest player in that space and waterfall was "the" project management standard.
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny, I'm having a similar experience, but made the opposite assessment. My company has been using TFS for many years, and one of our newer people has brought Jira in for his team and I find it incomprehensible. Besides the UI looking visually outdated in Jira, I find the workflow is incomprehensible. I do see the same workflow issues with the TFS web site that are being highlighted in this thread, but they are minor compared to trying to figure out how to navigate Jira.
I think it has a lot to do with what you are used to, I'm sure the reason you get the panicked look is because they are used to the tool they are using today.
|
|
|
|
|
Click.[^]
I had to make sure it wasn't an onion article, video looks real, I can't see any pixels.
Rage against the narrative.
"To Build a Fire" - A dystopian novel about project management, and I am the dog.
|
|
|
|
|
As in all good horror stories, the real problem for Canada is what lies beneath.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
As if we would want to sneak into the US...
|
|
|
|
|
Hey mods, move this message to a better place and I'll still love CodeProject. I couldn't find this topic listed.
Anyway, I am studying the ARM processor.
Doing the Stellaris LaunchPad, which I think is no longer sold.
The schematic I have here says that Pin 29 (in this case) is actually GPIO port F, bit 1.
I'll try to post a screen cap of the part of the schematic if it would help.
For now, my question is: Who made Pin 29 to be that bit on that port ?
Is it hard-wired in the ASIC ? Or is there a pin-assigning circuit in the chip which will let firmware do the choosing ?
My homework before posting this question included Google, Bing, and a few sites that didn't really answer the question.
The ARM site itself is currently overwhelming me; i.e., I would imagine the answer is probably on some page there, or some PDF file; now to guess where.
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: Hey mods, move this message to a better place and I'll still love CodeProject. I'm tempted to vote it as abuse, simply because you're asking the mods to do something that is actually your own responsibility.
C-P-User-3 wrote: I couldn't find this topic listed. There's "hardware and devices". Which were you looking for?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Mmmm..., not really familiar with ARM but I would guess that there is a reason, is Pin 28 or Pin 30 bit 0 or 2 or is it stuck in the middle of no-where, is GPIO port F one of the recommended GPIO's or is it a get of jail free option (Microchip PICs have some wacky pins for just that reason). Is the chip a BGA or a legged version of a BGA? It's too late in the day for this...I'm gonna start drinking until I don't care!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah this is the wrong place and this is for the most part a self governing site.
But to answer your question the ports on the Launchpad, and for that matter most embedded processor with the RISC architecture are memory mapped and cannot be changed.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure your launchpad isn't finished and operational? because I just heard something whooshing over my head.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Two policemen call the station on the radio. "Hello. Is that the Sarge?"
"Yes, what’s up guys?"
" We have a murder case here. A woman has shot her husband for stepping on the floor she had just mopped clean."
" Have you arrested the woman?"
"No sir. The floor is still wet."
|
|
|
|
|
|
RedDk wrote: Deuteronomy 28:56
The rest of it is even worse.
Marc
|
|
|
|