|
Here, have a compensational
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously, you check your rep votes daily, that's almost narcissistic.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Seriously, you check your rep votes daily, that's almost narcissistic.
Never checked mine. Only see the number in the top right. Don't know how these people find that they have a -16 vote or whatever.
Think I need to post about Maria Sharapova for a bit to raise the excitement levels a bit.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: Don't know how these people find that they have a -16 vote or whatever Well, in case you want to know,
Michael Martin wrote: Only see the number in the top right. just click on that number.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: Think I need to post about Maria Sharapova for a bit to raise the excitement levels a bit.
You just want to test the system again, or at least break it a little.
I have to admit I do check the rep stuff, approx twice a year. I am amazed the volume of downloads that are still done on the articles, 6 years after they were written!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: Never checked mine. I find it really handy, because the topic of a discussion often has nothing to do with its title, so a list of the topics you've posted messages to can help you find really important things that people say in the Lounge.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know, personally I'm using it as a transaction log as it's readily available in the upper right corner, and I don't have to check each different category under my profile.
|
|
|
|
|
And then there's me checking the reputation every now and then with the Reputation Watcher (a Chrome extension).
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh your not the only one by a huge margin, I just find it weird.
I had to give up on mirrors, too bloody expensive.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I've been inside this room[^] once. Mirrors everywhere. It's a very surreal experience, I can really recommend it sometime
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Two downvotes in one day without explanation On a completely unrelated note - when did you change your "Lazy<Person>" signature?
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Last weekend. That one started out as a little humour, but then people actually started to believe I was lazy.
That's not quite the image I wish to convey
|
|
|
|
|
And guess what, I have it as the signature of my primary email!
I don't care about people because everyone I communicate using that email already knows that I am too lazy.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
— Charles Caleb Colton
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking into using Quartz.net[^] but I haven't seen a good UI so that the user can schedule their own jobs.
Just curious what other people have used. Have you exposed scheduling to end users? If so how detailed was it, meaning could the user choose which days of the week, or perhaps every 3rd Tuesday, etc.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You can give a try with this one and extend the same based on your requirement.
https://quartznetwebconsole.codeplex.com/[^]
Quote: Have you exposed scheduling to end users? If so how detailed was it, meaning could the user choose which days of the week, or perhaps every 3rd Tuesday, etc. I believe it depends on the target user how well they understand the system. To some extent you can give this ability but as the best practices of Quartz says, you need to be really careful in exposing the scheduling ability as it requires a tight security else any malicious user can even destroy the system.
Thanks,
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I've always used plain .NET Console applications that are being started via the Windows Task Planner (or how it is called now) on e.g. a Web server.
Always satisfied my needs.
|
|
|
|
|
Uwe Keim wrote: I've always used plain .NET Console applications Wouldn't you need someone to be logged on for that to happen? Wouldn't a windows service work better?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I configure the task to run when the system starts. I also configure a user to run under.
Windows services are way harder to debug. I never had the need to use it when a console app also did the job.
|
|
|
|
|
OK. Thank you for the input.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|