|
Actually, that is correct. It would be compartment if you could get from one to the other internally but apartments are just discrete compartments. Sounded right when I thought it.
|
|
|
|
|
COM threading model flashback...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Why do we drive on parkways and park in driveways?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
There's far too much thinking going on in the Lounge, lately.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: hobby shop
No offence meant; but seriously, is hobby available for sale in a shop?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
It definitely looks tastier than let's say, carbon fiber.
|
|
|
|
|
It is, but not by much
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the United States of America, where I herald from; they are often called hobby shops...seriously.
No offence taken.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Have been to the US quite a few times; perhaps my eyes/mind did not catch them.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Edit: minus the ridiculously expensive part.
Try HobbyKing(.com), great stuff - amazing prices.
Here's a random example: AUD $108.79 (gasoline powered) pulse-jet - just like the ones used on the V1 bomb in WW2.
http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__34247__Hobbyking_Pulse_Jet_Gasoline_Engine_34_Red_Head_34_with_Ignition_System.html[^]
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
very cool. thanks for the link.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome, have fun.
|
|
|
|
|
“There are pretty immense torsional forces being put on the frame when the band is fully wound, which turned our starch car into a ticking bomb,” says Greenberg. “Any small cracks in the body would culminate in a huge explosion as the frame tore itself apart, often mid-way down the track.”
So you use two rubber bands.
Some people are just so dumb.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Before I retired I wrote several applications in C# Forms and some in WPF, but I never had any need to learn MVVM. So to keep busy in retirement, I delved into MVVM late in December last year. At first I started using Galasoft's MvvmLight, but when I started to grasp what the MVVM pattern was all about, I decided to start over, coding my own messenger class. With the help of Jon Skeet's book, some articles here on CP, some by Bugnion and some answers on Stackoverflow, I really got stuck into topics like custom events and other delegates.
Well, I had a few misfires, reloads and restarts, but my first project is now complete. I just wonder what I should do next? Should I learn what Prism is all about? Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: Should I learn what Prism is all about?
Yes.
I developed with/around Prism for a couple of years. Very interesting stuff; I liked it.
|
|
|
|
|
How about writing an article about your journey to enlightenment?
|
|
|
|
|
Please never pose that question to Nagy Vilmos
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personally if it is for hobby purposes, I would
a) write an article here about what you have done
b) expand on what you have, produce a sample MVVM application and see what problems you encounter - and write an article about that.
personally I don't like Prism much, or any framework really. I prefer to 'roll my own' and treat it as a pattern rather than a framework.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: personally I don't like Prism much, or any framework really
I agree with you. It was a lot more fun doing everything from scratch instead of taking the easy route and using MvvmLight for example. I found nothing wrong with MvvmLight - it is a good approach if you are limited on development time - which does not apply to me.
However, I did learn a great deal that could be of value to beginners with MVVM. Maybe I should create a demo project for an article here on CP. I do feel a bit guilty for taking so much from others like CP and Stackoverflow, and not really giving anything in return!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: Maybe I should create a demo project for an article here on CP.
That's what I did with my MVVM articles[^]; (shameless plug)I looked briefly at all the frameworks and decided they were too much trouble - the length of time required to learn them well probably exceeded the time it would take to develop what I required myself!
That's my beef with frameworks in general! They tend to try to provide way more functionality than I want, require a learning curve which makes them useful only if working on many new projects, and I spend more time working around their constraints than I save in using them in the first place.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|