|
OriginalGriff wrote: A bit like drinking the whole beer...and then finding the dog mess at the bottom of the glass.
Where exactly do you drink?
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much, I don't any more.
Surprisingly, that's not the reason...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Remind not to go drinking with you!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I was left with the same impression.
Couldn't quite decide wether I liked it or not. Decided to like it since I did enjoy the movie.
And I can always, for some reason, enjoy those vague parts...
I'm wondering what the 2001 test is though?
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I'm wondering what the 2001 test is though?
Was it as good? Was it the 21st century version of 2001? Was it as expansive? It had been mooted as such by some of the critics. For me, it failed because of the ending.
|
|
|
|
|
Karel Čapek wrote: For me, it failed because of the ending. TBH, so did 2001.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Everything is better than 2001...
I've seen 2001 in approx. 2010.
I didn't have to watch it for the special effects. I'm sure they were great back then, but special effects aren't exactly timeless.
Other than that it was just some images of space stations and space ships with Strauss music playing in the background.
The ending was just weird (even weirder than that of Interstellar).
Kubrick made some pretty awesome movies. 2001 isn't one of them.
Most overrated movie EVER! Period.
So yeah, Interstellar passed the 2001 test for me
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough; it is all quite subjective.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it is.
For me Interstellar was more of an Inception test.
Inception is one of the greatest movies ever and by the same director.
Needless to say it did fail the Inception test.
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Inception is one of the greatest movies ever and by the same director.
I did not much like Inception.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough; it is all quite subjective.
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: didn't have to watch it for the special effects. I'm sure they were great back then, but special effects aren't exactly timeless.
2001 was not about special effects. You saw it in 2010. That means you saw it when we'd been on the moon 40 years ago; we had a permanent space station; we had skype video conferencing and Siri and all that.
None of that had happened in 1968. Kubrick made a film that depicted a future world and future technology with a prescience that was impressive. There were no crazy costumes, no lasers, no space fighters: it was evolutionary technology mired in the practicalities of phsysics. He gave us just enough technology to explore the twin stories of finding alien intelligence and what happens when a completely logical mind is given conflicting orders. (You really should go on to read 2010 to get an idea of what actually happened to poor HAL)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Never thought of it that way.
The movie is still boring though (sorry)
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome as always. Looking forward to the Rosetta landing attempt this week.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
So, sat at my desk, one of our apprentices approaches with brithday cards.
Normally get 1 or two a week. There are 4 of them.
wtf.jpg
"I wonder what happpened 9 months ago".
Look at calendar and announce "Valentines Day!" and pat myself on the back at my own brilliance.
One of the cards is for m'colleague opposite.
And he's just signed his own card as he called shotgun.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Heh. Nice.
The "really bad snowstorm back then" correlation is a fun one too.
|
|
|
|
|
We have an 11 year old Cisco Catalyst 3550, which has been operating in cold, damp and at one point rained on conditions, the console port is somewhat rusty. Anyway the port has been brought to my desk for a reconfigure after a cleanup (back off and air line blown over it to remove dust and muck). Powered it on and it worked a treat. Cisco certainly build rebust switches.
I may use this to test my Android Based Serial/Telnet communication App I'm working on.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if their new switches are as robust.
|
|
|
|
|
I've notice the new models are scantly clad, i.e. extras like redundant power supplies and Cisco LX 1000 port missing oh and no console cables.
|
|
|
|
|
NormDroid wrote: Cisco certainly build used to build robust switches
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
NormDroid wrote: rebust Is that some sort of new kind of breast-related plastic surgery?
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|