|
I have also heard speculation that it was due to the perception in Japan of '9' being an unlucky number.
|
|
|
|
|
It has something to do with Bo Derek.
|
|
|
|
|
High version number implies more changes.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, because Snopes is the ultimate bastion of truth.
|
|
|
|
|
...because Microsoft uses base 9. No other reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously it's Microsoft Time; "7 Windows Remaining; 8 Windows Remaining; 7 Windows Remaining; 10 Windows Remaining" *Cancel*
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not upgrading until Windows 13, anyway.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I thougth it was just a bug. The first patch of the new O.S. will correctly rename it as "Windows 9"
|
|
|
|
|
It's a mistake.
All the even versions of Windows have been losers.
All the odd versions of Windows have been winners.
Seriously, examine the history of Windows and this becomes obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
"There are 10 types of people, those that understand binary math and those that don't"...
|
|
|
|
|
They have skipped it because 9 means ripping your money through Jedi mind tricks in every language. Just think about the prices ending with 9.
|
|
|
|
|
They didn't want Windows 9 < OS X, so they made Windows 10 == OS X.
|
|
|
|
|
The best reason I have seen on the web is the following:
Quote: A rather unique one was brought forth by a reddit user, claiming to be a Microsoft dev, /u/cranbourne. The user claims that calling it 'Windows 9' would result in errors with legacy code such as this:
if(version.StartsWith("Windows 9")) { /* 95 and 98 */ } else {
Looking at that, it seems rather wild. However, another user searched for this code, and found many examples of it online -- in software designed for Windows. Looking through the search, it does seem plausible. I first saw this in the subreddit /r/ProgrammerHumor, and could not make up my mind if it was not an elaborate joke. However, actually looking at some of the code in GitHub that has variations of this check, made me realize that, somehow, this is the theory that makes the most sense.
|
|
|
|
|
I read something like this on the web recently but I cannot for the life of me find it again.
Does anyone here remember such a piece? Do you happen to have the URL to hand?
Massive thanks in advance to the winner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are hundreds of those. Maybe this one?
http://norvig.com/21-days.html#answers[^]
Approximately infinitely long.
edit: modify "execute typical instruction" to 0.25ns. Nontypical instructions take longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Well given the typical 3GHz clock rate, everything would take 3 billion times as long than 1 hertz. So using the link above, accessing 1MB of memory would take approximately 1.9 years. And that's with no special calculations on top of it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
If a CPU cycle took one second, you'd have been dead of old age before your post here was displayed. In fact, you probably would have retired before the machine responded to your click on the Post message button which, in turn, would have been initialized sometime before you were born.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Coming up.......nnnnnnnow!
|
|
|
|
|
(rant-ish question)
So, naturally, I get on the internet and hop on to Microsoft[^] or to the Windows section[^].
Nothing, nada, rien, zip ...
Aren't they supposed to advertised this or do we have to search the internet to know if there will be a broadcast or some official preview/presentation somewhere ?
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Its definitely not going to be broadcast. There's about 50 journalists been invited to see it.
Best bet is to find out who they are and keep an eye on what they tweet/publish shortly after the event.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we'd benefits from them being given nice a delousing shower?
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is, you're looking for Windows 9. You should have looked for Windows 10[^] instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it'll be like the new U2 album on iTunes. It'll just "show up" on your computer one day.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|