|
var questions = this.forms.forms.selectItem().data.Groups().enumerable().where(function (x) {
return x.current.GroupType() === Server.GroupType.Normal;
}).selectMany(function (x) {
return x.data.Questions();
}).distinct(function (x) {
return x.current.ID();
}).array();
There is a real different?
Super Lloyd wrote: without good intellisense in JavaScript On what platform do you have intellisense problems whit this code?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I mean from this to that there are 17 dots.
17 ways of making an application breaking typo!
TypeScript will eliminate those!
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScript intellisense never gave me the exact method for the exact object I am using....
Maybe I missed out something?
But I always have a long list with all possible methods of all known objects?!
|
|
|
|
|
Did you used /// <reference path="MyObject.js" /> at the top of your code?
You also have to use new MyClass to let intellisense to correctly identify your object...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I didn't!
But I do now, otherwise the .ts file doesn't compile!!
|
|
|
|
|
Bus stations and railway stations carry more frieght and passengers too. The number of incoming and outgoing passenger load is all the more high. But the security and frisking is all the more high at airports. But nothing concrete has still been established in terms of security and hijacks anywhere in the world!
|
|
|
|
|
probably costs?
I am pretty sure the overall cost of an aircrash is way higher than a buscrash...
(Including possible life insurance)
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: overall cost of an aircrash is way higher than a buscrash...
Shouldn't value of life should be more than the commodities concerned?
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect 9/11 is part of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
I suspect 9/11 is part of it.
The only thing 9/11 contributed, IMHO, was an added charge in our air tickets as 9/11 fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that and how good planes are at bringing big buildings crashing down.
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: But nothing concrete has still been established in terms of security and hijacks
anywhere in the world!
That is what it appears to the public.
There is huge amount of 'intelligence' going on in the background which is steering these decisions. I was on a security course with work a few years back and it was interesting to hear that the [..........censored...........] were currently [..........censored...........]
Also some of the key targets such as [..........censored...........], is where the key concerns are. Take those out and it would [..........censored...........]
|
|
|
|
|
Buses and trains are pretty inefficient as missiles.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on what your target is.
|
|
|
|
|
You can jump out of Bus/Train,but not the Airplane...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fear & the ability to instil fear & outrage - the objectives of terrorism.
Blow up a train or bus most people are going to survive. Try and take over a bus or train and the driver just needs to stop for people to escape. Now imagine you are on a plane - the victims are effectively trapped
and at the mercy og the terrorists, if they take down and everybody dies. The media will report a plane incident much more than the other modes of transport. To increase the effect, chances are this is going to be an international incident - multiple nationalities so the "message" is going to be sent far and wide.
My guess is that if reporting of terrorist incidents was completely banned the threat would be mostly removed - this isn't about killing people, it's about creating a climate of fear and disruption. To this end many of the of the security procedures are actually doing what the terrorist wants. I certainly wouldn't want to travel to the US under the current paranoia nut-job levels of security checking.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Wish all my American Friends A Happy Independence Day!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not ALL the Americans, surely?
There are those that live in Canada and Mexico who do not care much for it!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I am Canadian. Mexicans live in Mexico. We live on the North American continent. I am NOT an American. Americans are those who live in the United States of America. Calling them USians is just plain stupid.
Get over it.
Happy 4th of July to ALL AMERICANS
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
So, by your argument, an Frenchman is not a European, and a Nigerian is not an African.
Are you sure?
I would also point out that you do not have to live in the United States of America to be an American.
In fact your argument gets weaker the more I read it.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
You can call me a North American if you want to, as dumb as that sounds to me. But I am definitely not an American.
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you are.
Are you going to answer my points from the previous post?
I bet you describe a Chinese person as Asian.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
You too are talking about two different things. While you Dave are correct about American being by definition someone living on the American continent, "American" has in many cultures been strongly associated with the US which is what PJ is saying.
In French, for instance, an "américain" is definitely someone from the US, with very few exceptions. Plus we would never call someone from Canada or Mexico "américain", and I guess that's what PJ Arends was trying to tell you.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|