|
To be clear my question is not whether I used it without knowing, it's about vocabulary!
Does "WCAG" means something to you? Does "accessibility"? Which one speaks more to you?
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, well yes Accessibility mean ssomething to me as It formed an element of my degree a couple of years ago as part of the Fundamental of Interaction Design (M364[^]) module.
|
|
|
|
|
Double You is the most awful letter to pronounce in English. It sounds like its two letters, Double and You. It also looks more like a Double Vee. The person who invented Double You was clearly drunk (and probably seeing double).
I'd never use an acronym having the letter Double You in it. I hadn't heard of it before either (or maybe I had, but I banned it from memory because of the Double You).
In Dutch it sounds more like Wee
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
So true! Double El is the only valid letter!
|
|
|
|
|
I had absolutely no idea what it meant.
What's wrong with the word "accessible"?
I pity you.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha! You understand me so well!!
|
|
|
|
|
If you create a website in VS and open the property pages you have a tab called "Accessibility".
In this tab you have a check box for "WCAG".
What this means to me, is that if I mess up my html according to whatever standard "WCAG" is,I get a warning.
|
|
|
|
|
Ho, interesting!
There is no such setting in "ASP .NET Web Application" project type...
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting indeed, I willl have to have a look at that when I come home tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correct, I have not seen Titanic, nor do I intend to.
|
|
|
|
|
Better version[^]
Well - shorter, but concise and to the point.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I'd watch that
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it's not hard to believe that people are still spending so much time and effort on such an old gag.
Creativity? Forget it; let's just do the same gag that's been done a million times, but with newer tech.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed that Xamarin appears to be quite a favoured topic for Articles, Blogs and Tips at the moment.
I haven't used it, I have had a look at the website, sounds / looks good, but the question is: Is it really? Does it justify its price?
Just curious.........
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Does it justify its price?
Not to me, it doesn't.
And I still want to use C# on OpenVMS.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
modified 27-Jun-14 18:55pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on how lazy you are. I'm working on a project and I don't want to be bothered to learn Java/Eclipse. Xamarin has been easy and seems to work great.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
snorkie wrote: I don't want to be bothered to learn Java/Eclipse
I gave up after about ten minutes.
Xamarin might be something I could use, but as I only use free development tools (VS Express, SQL Server Express, etc.) I may never know.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a free version but it is very limited in usefulness
|
|
|
|
|
This has been something on my mind as well. I have been looking into it as well it seems great from what I have read and seen.
However, it can be a bit pricey which is why I am currently weighing my options before I make the plunge.
|
|
|
|
|
We looked at it for our projects....
We are not using it for our projects.
'Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
|
The MonoDevelop IDE changed to "Xamarin Studio" after an update. It updated onto the C:, whilst the app was installed under D:. If I doubleclick on the icon on the desktop, the version on the D drive is started, and starts the download again.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|