|
Hahaha this is good one
I sometimes let resharper to change pices of code to linq as he advises, just to enjoy the result for a while and ctrl-z it back
Sure - 5-6 lines of code became one, but perfectly readable code vanished...
--
"My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."
|
|
|
|
|
You've been reading the same articles I have.
I think I suffer from Imposter Syndrome or at least have in the past. I am more confident in my skills now but I say in programming or software development keep an open mind. A person may have more experience than you on a certain aspect of a project or vice versa.
Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer)
www.simonshugar.co.uk
"If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil
|
|
|
|
|
"Two things are going on ... One is ..."
What is the other? The suspense in your post ...
I think what you describe is true in most areas where there is a high skill level, for some people. I always feel insecure in that regard in work, academia, sports and any team scenario like that, though only a bit (to the level where it drives me on, not makes me fearful or paranoid).
|
|
|
|
|
Just look at the Q&A and you're cured
|
|
|
|
|
And the other thing is? I mostly feel the opposite. Or I pose so. Does that mean I have negative imposer syndrome?
|
|
|
|
|
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: Two things are going on that are literally driving programmers crazy.
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: One is something..
And second ?
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: Two things are going on that are literally driving programmers crazy.
One is something known as the "imposter syndrome." ... What's the other one?
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: Women programmers
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I (think of myself as ) am a woman programer and I can think of several other CPians, who are also. You better not say anything wrong (bad) about us or something may happen. Be prepared and be scared !
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
I meant no offense
My best mentors in learning, programming and on the job have been women to whom I owe a debt of gratitude.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, its true the best programmers are all women
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
True, true, my wife has me programmed.
...oops, gotta' go.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I suffer from imposter syndrome...
...now if I can only keep that imposter from across the aisle from entering my cube and pointing out the obvious and unrelated issues.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice job copying this[^]. Excellent ctrl+c/ctrl+v skills.
No offence, but the reason I even looked for plagiarism is that I just couldn't believe you had suddenly become so articulate. You could try adding errors the next time you "borrow" some text without attribution.
|
|
|
|
|
Damn. We still don't know what the second thing is.
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm poster" syndrome - where I feel I am the poster of a message...
|
|
|
|
|
This deserves more upvotes.
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collin Jasnoch wrote: Windows 8.1 does not look like Windows 7. It looks more like a polished product.
Are you saying that W7 didn't look like a polished product?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't want to use W7 on a tablet, there are other OSes out there which do that job just fine. That said, MS should always have produced one product for tablets and one for the desktop. One-size-fits-all was a daft idea from the outset.
|
|
|
|
|
Collin Jasnoch wrote: a polished product
By "product", do you mean "turd"?
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 11-Apr-14 10:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
I was asking if you did. Besides, I couldn't even tell which "product" the "it" referred to in that sentence, I suspect some intentional ambiguity.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|