|
Daniel Engelkes wrote: FrontPage the software will put it's own HTML tags. and that is the same for all HTML editors
Not in my experience. I'm actually using FrontPage 2003 (Yes - FrontPage classic!) because it's so clean with it's HTML handling. Our HTMLArea based WYSIWYG editor doesn't often add tags. Obviously adding a paragraph or image will result in new tags being added, but they aren't unexpected tags.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: CKEditor seems the best so far - except that it refuses to do what I want it to and insists on mangling the HTML it's given. There is no "don't screw with my HTML" option.
Try adding <code>This is some code</code> inside a TD element in the editor. It strips it out.
Have you tried setting config.allowedContent = true; ? That way, it shouldn't strip anything out. I've just tried with v4, and it doesn't strip out a <code> block within a <td> element.
Also, no programming questions in the Lounge!
Also also: http://xkcd.com/1341/[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
A programming question would be "How do I do X". That would be unacceptable. However, "I can't do X because the stupid $#@! that was obviously written by blind monkeys on acid and never works no matter what I do even though I've not once looked at the manual or looked into the source code because I have better things to do, like blog about how crap X is" is considered on-topic and appropriate.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
But Shirley that's a loophole? Instead of asking "How do I do X?", you just post a rant about how stupid it is that it's impossible to do X, and wait for people to prove you wrong by explaining how to do X in simple terms.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Stop calling me Shirley.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've actually found that FCKeditor (the version before CKeditor) works better... there again, it might not like newer browsers -- but in any event, it doesn't muck things up quite as much. I know what you mean, though...
|
|
|
|
|
I am slammed for the next couple of months but, after that, I am all yours.
|
|
|
|
|
This should be fun
Lets do this!
|
|
|
|
|
Very funny.
Dose the WYSIWYG editor hourglass diaper on 1/04/2014?
|
|
|
|
|
Found that page will work with Google Chrome and Internet Explorer 11
Dosn't work with NeoPlanet and other IE clones.
|
|
|
|
|
Neoplanet? Wasn't the last stable release 13 years ago?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Chris!
I've forked the code and added some event handler for the mode change (not pushed yet). What isn't clear to me is - are you want to use some existing code for content modification on mode change or something new? In both case I need more info...
Old case - how to call that code
New case - what exactly do you want to change between mode switches? (I saw the img problem, but there is more?)
[Modification]
I've just playing around and noticed that setting baseHref like this
CKEDITOR.config.baseHref = "http://www.codeproject.com/KB/miscctrl/gridctrl/"; removes the need for playing with image source on editor mode change! It can be always the simple myimage.jpg form...Consider it...
[/Modification]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 23-Mar-14 7:24am.
|
|
|
|
|
I've merged your suggestions and added a concrete example of what was needed. Issue #1 is considered fixed!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In relation to the fourth item in your updated list (about sensible HTML)...
I wrote this article http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/748790/Beginners-Guide-to-HTML-CSS-Part-of[^] using the new editor. At the end I just copied the html code from my local copy to CP. I didn't got any 'insensible' HTML on the way. There is something specific I have to look for (except the line break in copied code, which I see no)?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
How was the experience with the new editor?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I found it very nice.
It never added extra lines between paragraphs (which happening me all the time with the current).
I liked the image insertion popup - it nice, clear and easy, also hyperlink creation is very nice...
The only thin I found different for the wrong direction is about the <code> block. I added it manually - as it's not on the toolbar (or I missed something) and when positioning the caret at the end of the line it was INSIDE the <code> block. It was a bit disturbing, but I'm sure that we can find a way to handle it...
In summary I can say that the new editor much more supportive, than the one we have today...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
DVD was always Digital Video Disk, for a long time. Then a few years ago, it became 'Versatile'! VERSATILE????!!!?!
And LOL was 'lots of laughs; as far as I always knew. Now it is 'laugh out loud'. When the hell did that happen?
|
|
|
|
|
My favorite definition of DVD is Dumb Vs. Dumber LOL
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
modified 19-Mar-14 17:05pm.
|
|
|
|
|
BillW33 wrote: LOL
Did you mean "lots of laughs" or "laugh out loud"?
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
I intentionally left that up to the interpretation of the reader.
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
|
|
|
|
|
So others don't have to...from Wiki (so it must be true!)
'Certain members[who?] of the DVD Forum proposed the backronym "digital versatile disc" to express that DVDs can store other data formats, though the forum never universally accepted this name and a 1999 report decreed that DVD was "simply three letters" and stood for "nothing".[7][unreliable source?] "Digital versatile disc" is the explanation provided in a DVD Forum Primer from 2000.' So what does DVR mean?
Around here they are called CDs anyway. I don't argue, I know what she means.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: So what does DVR mean?
A 1999 report decreed that DVD was "simply three letters" and stood for "nothing".
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
I never knew LOL as lots of laughs - it was always laugh out loud - used in online gaming before the days of microphones.
In any case, it's 707 down under
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: In any case, it's 707 down under
It is 555 in Thailand.
<explanation>
ha is the number 5 in Thai, so 555 is hahaha.
</explanation>
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|