|
Well, then it costs less to buy Comodo code signing certificate from thessslstore (about $100 per year).
<lol>Life is 2short 2remove USB safely
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at http://www.startssl.com/[^], you only pay the certification process and can get as many certificates as you want, so it may be worth the shot.
|
|
|
|
|
K-Software: http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/[^]:
The prices are competitive and the guy that runs the site (Mitchell) helps you get through the whole identification process as an individual.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be better to say that JavaScript is the new C64 BASIC. It's just as fast, efficient and fun to debug as any old interpreter and allows any {place insulting word of choice here] who was too dumb to understand object orientation or get used to data types to freely create programing horrors.
(*) Cool-Aid of the day. Have a big cup.
Sent from my BatComputer via HAL 9000 and M5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just guessing, but I think he has started a Javascript maintenance project. His is the normal reaction as far as I can see...either that or he's getting ready to flood "The Weird and The Wonderful" with examples of "how to do it if you are terminally brain dead". Again, that is a perfectly normal reaction to a Javascript maintenance project!
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
Close. Very close.
Sent from my BatComputer via HAL 9000 and M5
|
|
|
|
|
C64 BASIC was better.
JavaScript should be ashamed of itself. It can go sit in the corner with the other "broken type system"-languages such as PHP and VB.
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrripppppppt!!!!! If I had a time machine, I would have gone to past and burnt the blueprints!!!
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Amitosh S.M. wrote: blueprints
Blueprints?
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK they are planning plain packaging on cigarette packets - just think of all the extra space for sketching designs such as these.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
E. Majorana would have been happy.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Blueprints? Something used in Medieval times (My sophomore year of college) to make inexpensive copies of plans. Huge sheets of paper were used to create drawings of a design. (Written by hand, in pencil. Computers did exist, but were rather mythical. The head office was rumored to have one!) Another sheet the same size was immersed in chemicals was placed up to the plan, a special light was shined through both. The pencil marks blocked the light, the rest of the paper reacted to the light and turned blue, while the blocked portions remained white.
In ancient times, this was the way structures were built.
To this day, any kind of plan in any kind of medium is still called a blueprint by a fair segment of the population. (Mostly by people who have actually seen a blueprint or were infected by the people who still call it that.)
|
|
|
|
|
I know that. However it would imply there were a plan behind JavaScript.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
There definitely were plans behind JavaScript, but then you got people like me with no object oriented training picking it up and using it. Worked fine for what I needed, didn't even need to recognize there was OOP intent in the design.
|
|
|
|
|
Amitosh S.M. wrote: If I had a time machine, I would have gone to past and burnt the blueprints!!!
I would go back even further and burned the original implementation of HTML!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Hear hear!
(I could go into a similar rant about failing to learn from existing technologies to my SQL one they other day. In this case forerunners such as Doug Englebart (The Mother of all Demos), Ted Nelson (who coined the phrase Hypertext) and Apple's HyperCard.
They really should stop these scientists hacking.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Grainger wrote: and Apple's HyperCard.
I actually wish HyperCard was still around - I guess we have PowerPoint nowadays, but it's really not the same thing. One day I'll get back to working on http://app.intertexti.com/[^], my resurrection attempt (sort of.)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I would go back even further Hate to tell you this, but blueprints predate HTML about a hundred years. You would have to go back even sooner.
|
|
|
|
|
KP Lee wrote: but blueprints predate HTML about a hundred years.
Harhar. Well, then we might as well go back to the discovery of the wheel. Or better yet, fire.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, misstated that, I intended that when you were moving back in time you would have to hit the breaks sooner to hit just before HTML. IE less distance back in time, not more. I may have also totally misread what you said.
By the way, since you want something better than HTML at a time when HTML was a trailblazing concept, how would you go about convincing the designer "your" idea is better?
|
|
|
|
|
KP Lee wrote: how would you go about convincing the designer "your" idea is better?
By bringing a laptop back with me and showing him the nightmare that web development has become.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: ...showing him the nightmare... HTML is a simple markup language, originally designed to provide a reporting process over the web, it isn't complex enough to make the web a nightmare. You can't really lay the web environment we have now at its feet.
|
|
|
|
|
Wash your keyboard out with SOAP!
I quite like Assembly code...
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|