|
I know - we should just shift to entity framework and be done with it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I've saved a link to this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNU m4[^]?
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Dog[^]
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
blocked by the IT police
|
|
|
|
|
Dave, look at my FB Page.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
It is like the canine version of "The Good Life"....
|
|
|
|
|
I think the chicken is aware that something is amiss!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
The chicken has that same worried look as the sheep when Griff enters the field.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
First off, some background:
GNU Libiconv v1.14 has issues when enabling a relocatable library.
I was looking through the makefile, and saw that the relocatable.c file was missing from the sources list, so I added it, ran make, then make install, and it worked! That was somewhat fun to figure out (I hate makefiles).
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time my work in IT has caused me to mutter things that make no sense.
Today's example: I just received the 3rd revision to the final version of the specifications.
|
|
|
|
|
...and still waiting for the final revision to the final version of the specifications.
|
|
|
|
|
The part that doesn't make sense is the final version of the specifications
We all know there is no "final" version of specifications
|
|
|
|
|
^ This man has experience in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
There is actually a final version of specifications*
*Subject to change without notice.
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: There is actually a final version of specifications
I'd be happy with just that
|
|
|
|
|
Half the damn time there isn't a first version of the specification!
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the time my specifications are this:
Make it like project X, except it'll be different.
Of course they can't explain what is different, so I spend a couple hundred hours making something only to have to throw half of it out and do it again...
|
|
|
|
|
Every revision of a specification is the final version of that specification. The revision you get tomorrow is a new specification.
|
|
|
|
|
During a recent product release cycle, we made it to RC13. Yes, release candidate 13.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
microsoft are to sue for copying windows functionality
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|