|
Well, I though he was a some kind of Indian sitting down comedian (like the US stand up one)! (I saw a subtitled version a while back)
Was I wrong? is he really serious? Seeing a string of straight faced doubtful Indians I am starting to doubt myself!!
|
|
|
|
|
He was serious, and he has an expert opinion on pretty much anything in the world.
Can you imagine?
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
We have to put the old computers somewhere.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
may they rest in peace in the computer heaven
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of the most depressing things I ever read on the web. I used to live in blissful ignorance of just how disturbed/deluded/plain thick my compatriots are.
So Edward Snowdon's leaking of classified documents poses a very real tangible risks of terrorism in the UK and abroad. But as you might expect HYS is full of paranoid idiots who think the government is spying on them and their stupid lives and their porn habits. The guy is a a hero apparently for endangering every one of us.
My God. Really.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Philpott wrote: So Edward Snowdon's leaking of classified documents poses a very real tangible risks of terrorism in the UK and abroad.
so say people who profit greatly from a frightened and obedient populace.
Whoever is saying something publicly is doing so for their own agenda or that of someone paying them. Whoever is commenting on anything on the internet is a delusional idiot, ourselves included.
Incidentally, I'm related to Donald Maclean on my paternal grandmother's side.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisElston wrote: so say people who profit greatly from a frightened and obedient populace.
Basically false.
Every right has risks. Something that the framers of the US constitution understood.
There are real risks associated with what Snowden released. The question is not whether it could be used to further some terrorist plot but rather will it be and to what extent the papers themselves actually would impact such a plot (it might have proceeded without the release.)
ChrisElston wrote: Whoever is saying something publicly is doing so for their own agenda or that of someone paying them
Which of course covers every single statement made by anyone anywhere whether public or private, whether the internet, other media or even the living room of a house.
|
|
|
|
|
It's ridiculous to imagine that the Security Services have the resources to monitor the lives of everyone. Even the Stasi wasn't that efficient.
[OT - You're out of milk. Again.]
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Philpott wrote: This is one of the most depressing things I ever read on the web. I used to live in blissful ignorance of just how disturbed/deluded/plain thick my compatriots are.
So Edward Snowdon's leaking of classified documents poses a very real tangible risks of terrorism in the UK and abroad. But as you might expect HYS is full of paranoid idiots who think the government is spying on them and their stupid lives and their porn habits. The guy is a a hero apparently for endangering every one of us.
My God. Really.
Finding it rather difficult to know how to take this message of yours. Can't work out if it's a rant or sarcasm or a bit of both.
If you're serious, why not send all of your banking details, shopping habits and household internet habbits to me. I don't know you, won't share them with anyone and aren't particularly interested in the contents. Your secrets are safe with me! Go-on, blindly share personal information with someone for whom it has no utility - I dare ya!
Yeah - exactly! Elephant that for a joke. Some of us take exception to the kinds of blanket-(no suspicion necessary)-surveillance undertaken by a particular agency in the States. Edward's not about to get my condemnation any time this week.
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like politics to me - belongs elsewhere.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: Sounds like politics to me - belongs elsewhere. Up against the wall with the politicians, maybe?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom of speech is good - but it's not quite that simple.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
Did you ever see "The Captain's Paradise", especially the last scene?
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, but Google reveals it's an Alec Guinness movie that I haven't seen, so I shall certainly look it up.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
When you find it and see it, tell me what you think of that last scene (it is the same scene as the first scene, only that it completes the story).
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Philpott wrote: So Edward Snowdon's leaking of classified documents poses a very real tangible risks of terrorism in the UK and abroad. Sorry, but I don't follow.
How can revealing that our government, which we elected to protect us, is treating us all like criminals be construed as helping ter'r'rists?
The 15 ter'r'rists in the world don't need that kind of help; they can do the job without it.
What we need is a truly democratic option to elect a government that will not allow honest people to be treated like criminals, but it's not in the government's interest to give us that.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
It's just like Identity cards: just how the heck would they have prevented terrorism? Would suicide bombers be thwarted because they didn't have one?
The security services of both countries seem to be trying to take over, and in the name of freedom removing what little freedoms people had left...
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
Next, they'll be telling us that we have to invade North Africa because we need more "living room".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: The 15 ter'r'rists in the world
That can't be true.
The new head of MI5 who has told us how dangerous Snowdon's leaking is for the country also told us last week that there are thousands of Islamist extremists in the UK thinking of attacking the British public.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisElston wrote: The new head of MI5 who has told us how dangerous Snowdon's leaking is for the country also told us last week that there are thousands of Islamist extremists in the UK thinking of attacking the British public. Did they say it on the Internet?
If they didn't say it on the Internet, it can't be true.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
And we need pictures of them, or it didn't happen!
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
If the leaks showed anything, it's that your govt is in fact spying on all of you. And also on all of us (ie the rest of Europe), which isn't really necessary, we're already spied on by own respective secret services.
It was already known, really. The leaks just confirmed it, and showed the scope to be bigger than most people expected.
And if you're a terrorist, you have to assume that you're being spied on with special priority - proper cloak and dagger stuff, not just a phone/internet tap.
|
|
|
|
|
My view is anything you do on or say can come back to bite you. I know of a guy who filled in a form at Freshers Week because of a cute girl was talking to him, did nothing more than that. Later he was refused a work Visa for the states. It was for the Communist Party! Equally Snowden was a Sys Admin for a company that did work for the NSA wasn't he, he should have said something and excused himself from the project. I am of the opinion if you are trusted with something you should do it to the best of your abilities and not leak like a cracked vase, my two penny worth?? To quote my mum "he showed a lack of breeding by leaking all that information"
|
|
|
|
|
Completely disagree, if you discover anyone is up to something immoral or illegal then it is your duty to tell people.
Ignoring it is just one step away from "I was just obeying orders".
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
Spot on.
In fact, it is your legal duty, so he could have been tried as an accomplice for not whistle-blowing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|