|
I've been waiting till the radius got smaller! What brand and model did you get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will be curious as to what you come up with. I am a similar age to you. At home, I have curved monitors and at work I have flat. The flat monitors at work always look bowed out to me. Freaks me out.
|
|
|
|
|
Two 24" curved Samsung side by side they work like a charm. No issues.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had the same arrangement for about 3 months and I'm pretty happy. I was lucky that I could buy the same model again after more than a year so they match. They are just FHD; if they were any more than 24 inch, the pixels would be too big.
|
|
|
|
|
Supposedly, the curve means less eye strain because there aren't as many changes to focal length. Looking left/right/center the screen stays closer to the same distance from your eyeball.
I'm not sure it matters with the small one I bought for work. I use one curved and one flat in the typical side by side setup. I don't notice a difference working more on one than the other.
The gargantuan one I have for personal use is a G9. If those ever get cheap enough I will definitely buy two and stack them vertically for ultimate home office setup. Maybe it can roll into the work setup as a hand-me-down after a couple generations present a really attractive personal use replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 49" 4K flat monitor that I use when I work from home. I'm starting to think that I would like a curved screen -- the left and right edges are farther away than the center. Not sure if it would make a difference on a smaller monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting addicted to the M5 Stack/Stick/Stamp ecosystem. I don't really care about their modularity (cool, but expensive) but the actual MCUs come really nicely packaged with a stunning array of peripherals.
I bought an M5 Stack Fire, and am now awaiting an M5 Stack Core2. They're just cool.
They really figured out a direct line to my wallet these folks - I'll give them that. They're like Legos that way. Heck, they even attach to them in some cases.
I said so recently, but it bears repeating - these are great widgets for getting started with Arduino and IoT stuff without having to wire anything up.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: great widgets for getting started with Arduino and IoT stuff without having to wire anything up
But the wiring is half the fun! Explorer Edition Fun[^]
Of course, once I got it all built, I put it away and haven't done any coding.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it's fun! And these devices do have grove connectors for wiring in your own doodads to them. It's just that you don't *have* to do it before you can do a whole bunch of things with them.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
That kit you posted reminds me of the 200-in-1 electronics kit Radio Shack use to make. It was what I cut my teeth on when i was smol and impressionable.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Very cool - I remember those! I got my start with The American Basic Science Club[^]
It even came with a radioactive sample to demonstrate the spinthariscope and cloud chamber! Simpler times...
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Looks good. Meh... I'm SO tired of prequels / sequels / remakes.
|
|
|
|
|
In today's world, that doesn't leave out much.
Prequels/sequels, I'll put up with. If the material is decent enough.
All-out reboots are never any good IMO. That shows a severe lack of imagination.
What I'm totally done with (and it's been the case for over two decades for me) is comic book movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: What I'm totally done with (and it's been the case for over two decades for me) is comic book movies. Agreed. It seems with each successive movie/show/book, it's less about the characters and their stories and more about the writers'/publishers' agendas. The last 2-3 years has been an order of magnitude worse.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Then they run out of ideas and "reboot" the franchise.
Whenever something is "rebooted", I feel like it's the producers telling me to forget about anything that has happened until now, this time around, it's the story that was really, really meant to be told (and we mean it this time)...
Needless to say, that doesn't work for me. It's insulting to the audience's intelligence. If you can't tell an ongoing story that doesn't conflict with what you've established before, it's time to give it a rest.
|
|
|
|
|
The first time a new story is done well is amazing - the first (yet 4th) Star Wars movie, the first Indiana Jones story. Those are the ones I enjoy. Anything after that is just milking the idea - trying to do bigger and better -- and I lose interest.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks interesting, but as a series meh.
The most expensive tool is a cheap tool. Gareth Branwyn
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: as a series meh
The 3 movies (extended) totaled 10+ hours. They could have made it into a series.
|
|
|
|
|
With a movie you have a set time to tell the story; introduce the characters, tell the story and finally fold everything together for an ending. Whether it's 90 mins or 10+ hours there is closure.
With a TV series there is an ongoing story, it becomes a soap serial just drifting.
The most expensive tool is a cheap tool. Gareth Branwyn
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I'd disagree, in some cases.
The Expanse as a movie would have been as cr@p as Ender's Game was: far too much cut out to fit into a couple of hours.
There are other examples: Picard, Babylon 5 (the movies were ... erm ... terrible), Game of Thrones.
Movies are generally a short story long: a TV series (done right) is a novel! Followed by Book 2 for the second season if we're lucky - I can't think of a sequel movie that wasn't just a rehash of the first with a slightly different plot.
That's not say that all TV is brilliant: most of it is tedious drivel. but it does allow more time to set the scene, introduce the characters, get the story rolling - without the need to cram that into the first ten minutes so they can get to blowing stuff up!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Not all movies are good, and not all TV is bad, I was just generalizing.
Well not TV TV as it's commercials with a very short story rolled in somewhere. A lot of it is just reality TV anymore.
The most expensive tool is a cheap tool. Gareth Branwyn
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: With a movie you have a set time to tell the story; introduce the characters, tell the story and finally fold everything together for an ending.
Which is why I don't mind 3-hour movies. If you can rush all of that into a 90-minute movie - you don't have much to draw from anyway.
|
|
|
|