|
Thanks very much, I really appreciate you taking time to do this for me.
It's very interesting data and looks like WinHost is at the very least 2X slower than SmarterASP.
|
|
|
|
|
your benchmark is really good reference for me!
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati OH - WinHost 6.571 secs, SmarterASP 0.883 secs
Through our corporate VPN (somewhere in Texas) WinHost 4.603 secs, SmarterASP 3.468 secs (but our VPN is slow at everything)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for running the tests & posting results. WinHost does seem to be consistently & drastically slower.
|
|
|
|
|
WinHost Site: 7.85
SmarterASP.net site: 2.075
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much. It looks like the difference is holding up around the world & is related to the host.
|
|
|
|
|
WinHost : 24.0
SmarterASP : 1.3
The DDOS exception is legit, imho.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for trying it out & posting.
It's amazing how extreme the difference was in your (case 24s versus 1.3s).
|
|
|
|
|
The DDOS exception is not being willing to find a solution to me, charge a bit more and put your website behind a CDN
|
|
|
|
|
To me (Italy)
WinHost sits at 11.299 and
SmarterASP.net at 10.812
|
|
|
|
|
very interesting that both of them are in the same range from Italy.
thanks very much for running the test.
|
|
|
|
|
beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
171.89 seconds elapsed during load.
beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
119.208 seconds elapsed during load.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you still using dial-up?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for trying this & reporting the results.
Wow! I was curious if times would be longer from other locations around the world (other than North America).
Someone reported that Italy was longer time too, but over 100 seconds is hardly even usable.
|
|
|
|
|
WinHost: 12.8
SmarterASP.net: 1.6
So, night and day.
If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw.
I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.
|
|
|
|
|
Do, you won't regret it, they are ace. (I'm not affiliated with them in any way, just a happy customer and a big, big fan.)
|
|
|
|
|
Winhost 47.179s vs SmarterASP 2.965s (Sweden)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for running the test & posting results.
I see there's a large difference between the two in Sweden.
|
|
|
|
|
(1) 44.74 s (!)
(2) 5.30 s
Accessed from a superfast, optical connection.
|
|
|
|
|
Another drastic difference in times. Thanks for running the test & posting.
|
|
|
|
|
Winhost approx 8 seconds.
Smarter Asp approx 2 seconds.
I suggest checking out Interserver.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks so much for running the test. WinHost is consistently (from around the world) 2 - 10X slower.
Gary S 2021 wrote: I suggest checking out Interserver.
That's so funny, because I just (before reading your messsage) signed up for 1 month & I uploaded speedTest files & tesed & it was less than 1 second to load.
|
|
|
|
|
1.1s (winhost) vs 14.7s (sMaRtErAsP.nEt). From: PA, USA.
raddevus wrote: SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS
This shouldn't matter unless they're using decade+ old servers; anything newer has hardware acceleration in the CPU and should see something like a 1% performance impact from HTTPS.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
Run from Rockford, Illinois
Winhost: 13.496
SmarterASP: 6.489
Sincerely,
-Mark
mamiller@mhemail.org
|
|
|
|