|
Hi Nick,
1. For screen recording, I recommend OBS Studio[^] -- it's free.
2. For editing, I shamelessly recommend my own software -- Cinematic Studio - trimming/editing is a bliss, and you can do some pretty slick text effects
Best,
John
|
|
|
|
|
For recording, I would go for OBS.. It's used by lots of streamers/youtuber's. You could even go Streamlabs OBS which is a reskinned version.
For editing, you cant go past Davinci Resolve. You'll only need the free version.
|
|
|
|
|
For editing get Davinci Resolve. It is simply amazing. I've used some other programs in the past to edit videos and no one is as powerful as this one FOR FREE and, moreover it is easy to use.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not often that I geek out anymore, but looking up that software and seeing that they offer the whole suite of hardware to go with it made my nerd side happy.
|
|
|
|
|
I use SnagIt from Techsmith. One of the more user friendly ones I've used especially when it comes to the editing portion.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll throw another vote in for Camtasia. I have used many versions over the years for making training videos. It's been all good. One of the most enjoyable pieces of software I can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to everyone who answered I already chose Camtasia.
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Quick FYI: I recently discovered there's built-in video screen capture in Win 10. (I think editing is limited to cut/paste but I don't remember the details.) PC Mag article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lateral moves (within the same organization)
|
|
|
|
|
The range of movement is astonishing but it is still just programming, what amazes me is the bush navigation capabilities where presumably the robot has to make decisions (assumes they have not repeated the process umpteen times).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: The range of movement is astonishing
That was my thought also, movements almost looked life like.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
By "just programming" are you stating someone coded each and every motion I can't imagine a more tedious task I would presume the humanoid robots were fed a motion capture via worn sensors of a human dancer or perhaps merely a video of the dancer and then mimic the motion while calculating the necessary balance unique to themselves Perhaps that is your meaning As for the dancing doggy and that other thing I have no idea Perhaps they were merely tediously programmed Catchy tune though What is "bush navigation"
|
|
|
|
|
PaltryProgrammer wrote: By "just programming" are you stating someone coded each and every motion I can't imagine a more tedious task I have programmed industry robots for some years and I can ensure you, it is not tedious at all. That and PLC programming is a lot of fun.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Where's Isaac Asimov when you need him? Dick Clark for that matter?
Are the 3 laws of robotics built in?
Robbie
|
|
|
|
|
Good or Bad Idea?
modified 3-Nov-21 11:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
you sound like Father Jack Hackett! Yes to good or Bad?
|
|
|
|
|
MarcusCole6833 wrote: Yes to good or Bad? Yes.
But seriously, how can anyone answer such a question? We know nothing about you, nothing about the organization you work for, nothing about your present or future roles, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Without context, it could be either I suppose.
Developer to PM? doesn't sound that lateral to me.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
modified 3-Nov-21 11:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
Terrible for me, but may be great for you. There's no one size fits all answer to this question. It depends on the individual and the organization in which they work.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say Good, making lateral moves will get you experience in more activities of the company, which may be a gateway to a future vertical move.
All this on a purely theoretical basis as we know nothing of the place.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
MarcusCole6833 wrote: Good or Bad Idea?
Why might be good or bad?
|
|
|
|
|
No context no sensible answer - I do know of a few people who did that move and it was a disaster (me being one of them).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
It is up to you, but it is not a move that I would make.
I made a move from developer to the 'Lead' of developers and all I ended up doing was less coding and more babysitting of other developer projects.
To me a PM would be along the same lines, less coding - more babysitting. Just not for me. I went back to my developer role and couldn't be happier. I am 64, so that also plays into my thoughts.
Good Luck!
|
|
|
|