|
Inheritance.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I know it's a joke, but I just wanna say... the vast, vast majority of millionaires are self made.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
… the vast majority of billionaires are self-made snake oil salesmen.
FTFY.
Eg. Oracle and SAP.
And Elon Musk with his self-driving automobiles.
modified 7-Sep-24 21:25pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny you didn’t mention Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos. It’s always the same old story with people like you, never have anything nice to say. Quick to insult. And apparently hate anyone with money.
I could list some of the great things Musk did, for instance. But, I’d bet you’d still hate him because of your programming. And I have zero delusions.
This is the part where you disagree… because that’s all people do online.
Also, a billionaire and a millionaire are not the same thing. You took this post and perverted it into something bad. Shame on you.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't followed Gates, but Bezos deserves all the scorn that can be heaped on him for his continual lawsuits against NASA and SpaceX. And no, I'm not a Musk fan, but Blue Origin has yet to deliver any orbital systems and SpaceX has not one, but two orbital class rocket systems now. Every time BO has lost a NASA contract they've filed a lawsuit against NASA over their losing the contract to SpaceX.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for bringing some intelligence to this chat. I'm actually a fan of Musk and welcome any criticism as long as it's not politically charged, biased, etc. Nobody is perfect. I simply wish people wouldn't hate based on what TV tells them to hate when it's the thing to do.
I upvoted you btw, because at least you're talking like you paid attention.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my reply from millionaires to billionaires because anyone who had bought a house in the 1990s is probably a millionaire today merely because of the inflation in the price of homes. (My home was NOT in California which is seeing hyper-inflation in home prices.)
To add to that, maxed-out contributions to 401(k) and purchasing company stock through stock purchase plans add to one’s wealth. Anybody in the tech business in the US can become a millionaire by the time he retires, though a million dollars nowadays may not mean what it once did.
Anyone who starts his 401(k) plan at age 22 and continues for 45 years would certainly be a self-made millionaire and an ethical and honest one at that.
I compare these situations to those in power at Oracle or SAP. False promises that
are never kept, continuously forcing upgrades on customers that waste time and money, etc. SAP customers who have customized some of SAP functions to meet their specific requirements are told all of that would have to go by the wayside when they move to the cloud. What happens to their business? The attitude is: cut your feet if they don’t fit the shoe I have sold you.
I was working for a high-tech company that had 5 customers in 1996. The total number of customers it had in its entire history is maybe 1200 and its product portfolio over the company’s life was 160. Our revenue was over $800 million so we were a cash cow. A Big 4 consultant recommended that we install SAP. If I had gone along with that, I could have become an SAP consultant a year later and billed out at $300 an hour. I couldn’t see why the company needed SAP. We were the reference site for all semiconductor companies without semiconductor foundries in the Bay Area for our hardware and software vendors. But the consultant asked for $13 million to advise me on how to implement SAP. Right there you could see the ethical conflict.
Read about Jeff Bezos’s warehouse workers who can’t even take a bathroom break. Read about the UPS drivers who carry a bottle to pee into. Read the horror stories
About the Oracle ERP implementation disaster at Birmingham City Council (UK). Then tell me that billionaires earn their money ethically. I will then know which way your ethical compass points.
|
|
|
|
|
Vivi Chellappa wrote: And Elon Musk with his self-driving automobiles.
I don't think the self-driving "feature" of Elon's cars is the main selling point.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe not.
But people are paying extra for the “Full self-driving” feature, expecting that is what it means and fail to read the small print full of weasel words.
And that is what causes the fatal and non-fatal accidents. And the weasel words protect Elon Musk.
By the way, since “Full self-driving” is a software, it is not transferable from one Tesla owner to the next!
That gives me an idea: if power steering, power brakes, cruise control can be enabled/disabled by software which merely trips a circuit, car manufacturers can disable the function when the vehicle is sold in the used-car market and charge for enabling it again!
|
|
|
|
|
Vivi Chellappa wrote: But people are paying extra for the “Full self-driving” feature, expecting that is what it means and fail to read the small print full of weasel words.
That's their mistake. Governments all over the world have called out Tesla multiple times on this. They don't recognize it as such, and neither should consumers.
All car company ads claim theirs is the best. They can't all be right. But I don't get all huffy and puffy when I hear it and I know it's not true. It's called marketing.
Vivi Chellappa wrote: By the way, since “Full self-driving” is a software, it is not transferable from one Tesla owner to the next!
I'm not gonna say you're wrong, but I would welcome a link to Tesla's EULA or equivalent that spells this out.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a feeling or can it be proven?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a report off the top of my head, because only people without experience carry around facts all day long IMO. If we're being honest, most people just Google crap and pretend to be experts.
But, unlike those that have zero experience in the field I've spent decades studying millionaires either in real life, in books, or online. I also know a couple in real life, including some in my close family (as in plural). Also, one of my brother's buddies growing up became one through a lawsuit. So, I've also seen firsthand just how full of it and dishonest some people are when it comes to money (not him for the lawsuit, from people around him). For instance, I watched how my mother changed in how she treated said dude once he became wealthy. I've also spent time in Beverly Hills studying people, so I know exactly what the trust fund babies act like. Doesn't take a genius to figure out who earned it.
But do you think most people will go to where the rich are to study them? No, most people online are just fake, thus my lack of inclination to entertain nonsense these days. It's always the same old crap that's rooted in jealousy and hate (not you man, the other post). There's always gonna be some dude who hasn't even left his house pretending to be an expert online because some stupid news story told them what to think.
While I'm not ultra wealthy myself (yet) I've made more than most people in my field that I've met, given the fact I have no college degree and not working for a FAANG company. And that was 100% proportionate to how much effort I've put into my education and ability to do my job and invest. So, given the fact the personal experience is anecdotal, I don't solely rely on my experience alone for that stat. It could've been a book I read a decade ago. But, it did sick with me. It might've been The Millionaire Next Door. I'd have to read it again to be certain; it's been a long time since I've read it. Good book, though. Anyway, it's common knowledge amongst the wealthy; only the poor think it was magic to justify the fact they'd rather play video games, etc.
If you need an online source, even Forbes (which is usually wrong IMO  ) agrees: 10 Habits Of Self-Made Millionaires. You'll have to read it as the title alone doesn't elude to the point.
Also, if you need another online source, peeps like Dave Ramsey would agree with what I'm saying. He's interviewed 1,000s of millionaires and will say the same. Just go start watching his YT videos.
Anyway, thanks for actually asking. Sorry if this came off as poopy, but it's because I am. Most people (not you) aren't here to genuinely learn. Like even if I talk about investing here, people just wanna talk about themselves and give me advice despite the fact I can tell I've made more money than them having figured out stuff they haven't yet when it comes to trading, etc. It's all ego and nonsense. I will give you this stat though, I've lost 60K in crypto listening to broke arse clowns who are fake and pretended to be experts though. Don't worry, I'm ok... unlike these fake peeps online. But still, that's a lesson you only want to learn once.
I've seen enough to instantly spot the BS these days. Including running a meetup group about Forex while I lived in California. Maybe I'm a lousy teacher, but I lost interest in running it when peeps where there to brag, etc. despite them having never made money.
So, I'm just grumpy these days. And I always will be until I find my peeps.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 8-Sep-24 11:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
Lol, that much text, just to tell 'I can't prove it'.
Please do not take it as offense, but what you write it's simply what you denounce.
Now let us forget it 
|
|
|
|
|
You clearly didn't read the link man. Don't ruin a good thing by proving to me you're just like the rest of them. 
I gave you THREE citations. THREE.
And if we're going to play this game, you can't prove I'm wrong. Do better.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
How many millionaires have you personally talked to and learned from by the way? One... None? I bet it was none. But that won't stop you from acting like this online. I just gave you very high quality information and you wrote it off. It's a waste of my time, clearly.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Please excuse me if you feel attacked/misunderstood by me. That was not my intention in any way.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: For instance, I watched how my mother changed in how she treated said dude once he became wealthy.
And it doesn't need a big (a.k.a. rich) amount of money to see that.  
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I've lost 60K in crypto listening to broke arse clowns who are fake and pretended to be experts though.
Down 18k€ partially due to listen who I didn't have to. Not everything lost yet, because I didn't sell, companies still exist, but by all means a good teacher.
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Including running a meetup group about Forex while I lived in California
Forex is only playing with exchange currencies of different lands? Or does it include more? (Just curious, I know I could google but I want to hear it with you instead of a out-of-the-box tipified answer)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: And it doesn't need a big (a.k.a. rich) amount of money to see that.
Amen to that.
Nelek wrote: Down 18k€ partially due to listen who I didn't have to. Not everything lost yet, because I didn't sell, companies still exist, but by all means a good teacher.
Funny thing is man, crypto is following the same exact bust boom cycle the web did in the early 2000s and late 90s. It's a tech that isn't going anywhere; it does need to be priced accurately. It's the tulip craze all over again. And, the bust cycle will weed out the losers/phonies in the market. Which is a good thing because it'll never be taken seriously until the phonies are gone.
The lesson I had to learn the hard way is, the "less intelligent" the person they more sure they are of something they know little about. They can be very convincing, even if you know better. So, at least you're not alone.
Nelek wrote: Forex is only playing with exchange currencies of different lands? Or does it include more? (Just curious, I know I could google but I want to hear it with you instead of a out-of-the-box tipified answer)
This is why I like you man, you're smart. Short answer is yes. Since the likelihood of using using a one-world currency any time soon is zilch, it's an important market for the global economy to help us price imports, exports, travel, etc. Any time you go to a currency exchange shop when visiting another country, they're tapping into the Forex market.
Of course as with any markets you also have derivatives, such as a futures market as well. But, there's a lot "less" to it than the stock market. For instance, there's no concept of options in Forex. There's interest that can be paid out, but you don't really get dividends, perks from holding stock, etc. But, it's by far the most liquid market on the planet, for reasons I can elaborate on if you really want. Slippage is not an issue in the Forex spot market. Shorting is no big deal because it's cash and easy to borrow against. Which IMO makes it great for trading. For investing, that's a different story though.
The money supply value is essentially the value of a country's economy all rolled up into one. So, kinda like the S&P in that regards but on steroids and fluctuations in it are usually less severe for the popular currencies. Personally, I love it, but it's the wild west compared to more mature market. Event though Forex has been around for a loooooong time, it wasn't opened up to retail traders until relatively recently.
I could go on...  I'm sure an options trader would talk about options all day, etc.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 8-Sep-24 16:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: for reasons I can elaborate on if you really want
I would like to, but not now, I am going through a turbulent time in this moment and I do not want to start anything new, if I can't really focus on what I do (even less if it might imply a risk to my economy).
I already have all what I have and although it is not good to "fire and forget", it is the only thing I can do while focusing in one, two or max three things until it / they get solved.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the smart approach man. Focus on one or two things and master them. Forget the rest... master something and be better than everyone else at it. Wishing you the best of luck with it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Side note, not sure if you ever read about the Tulip market bubble in the 16th-17th century. But it's great story to read up on. This whole concept of freaking out over stupid crap thinking you'll print money has been around forever. Nothing new.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 8-Sep-24 16:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: This whole concept of freaking out over stupid crap thinking you'll print money has been around forever. Nothing new.
No wanting to start a discussion, but I think that's specially the strategy of the US.
Here I might get in the "not informed enough topic that you complain above", though: For me, once the US got out of the "backing money / debts with gold" they got a white card / free ride on pumping the market with new printed bills, everything has been getting wild(er than usually / needed) since that.
It currently is not only a problem with the US, of course, a lot of countries do that, but if I am not wrong they were the first stone causing the lawine.
Note: I am not willing to enter in politics, it is only an additional comment about the affirmation you said.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, it's clear you don't take the time to read all my posts before responding. To put this bluntly David, I know exactly who you are. I'm not convinced you have the first clue who I am.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
