|
Me thinks voting results should remain unannounced until it's all over. All polls should be closed and all votes counted before a word is said.
Then, there's no undue influence involved.
What do you think?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
But because the different states decide how to run the election, they will never agree on something as simple as that.
Nihil obstat
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Me thinks voting results should remain unannounced until it's all over.
Me thinks the voting results should remain unannounced. Period.
Neither of the candidates is competent, imho.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I can't argue with that
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
It has been the lesser of two evils for some time now.
|
|
|
|
|
My thoughts, exactly. But what else are they going to report on in order to sell more advertising?
It's interesting (and depressing) to me to look back over my adult life, and realize that not once has my Party offered me a credible candidate to vote FOR, though the other Party has had no trouble fielding candidates I wanted badly enough to lose that I forced myself to vote. If one Party can consistently offer up candidates who are evil and incompetent, one would think that the other Party would have enough sense to offer a clear alternative. But, Nooooo....
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|