|
No Netflix or sky, neither HULU here...
"Network TV" is still starting here...
|
|
|
|
|
No idea... I have cable TV, sitting next to a wireless router that's super high speed for streaming multimedia to any and all devices in the house, and I still can't figure out a way to send the TV signal to my PC in the next room. I can easily send PC content to the TV, but it doesn't seem to work the other way.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Just in case the data that is being send is DLNA, you can always use XBMC as a DLNA client for your PC for free.
|
|
|
|
|
Streaming the signal isn't the problem; squirting it into the router from the cable TV box is the problem. It's not supported. I'm guessing that, if I invest in one of these new-fangled flat TVs with all the bells and whistles, the TV might have a port that allows injecting the current program into an IP network. I don't see any other way it could work.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
You probably would be able to insert a capture card in your pc and then use VLC or SERVIIO to make the streaming at real time.
That would work only for the program you would have set in the TV BOX.
See VLC ==> MEDIA ==> Capture device ==> Digital TV
And then you could select EMIT to send that capture as a stream into your network.
For sure there will be better options out there...
|
|
|
|
|
Roger, looking for new ways to configure serviio I've found this video about a product from avermedia which could help you to send the TV signal to any amount of devices...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as7qnfqC-mo[^]
Hope this helps...
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody suggested trying Linux.
So can I suggest trying Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course you can, but this breaks the first requisite of Windows 7...
|
|
|
|
|
I will keep my Linux suggestion to myself then.
I just thought I would suggest it as I recently removed Win7 from a laptop and installed Ubuntu and I have been quite impressed with it.
I thought my non-techy wife would hate it but she actually quite likes it too.
|
|
|
|
|
Ubuntu rocks, I've tested it a couple of times (mainly to recover data from dying laptops) and I've liked it. It's easy to use and intuitive, but now that I have everything ready to work at home changing from 7 to Linux is not a choice...
Who knows, I could try to install it in a virtual machine and cross fingers to make the TV-card work...
|
|
|
|
|
Just had to write a .DAT and a .BAT file!
I will not embarrass myself by explaining why, just say that a lack of programming skill has been made evident by a small report I needed to have uploaded to a website each morning!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Why what is wrong with cmd files or powershell scripts.
If you are going to performing such hacks, and least move forward with the times a few years!
|
|
|
|
|
What I did, works.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
And that is all that matters
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but it is very crude and nasty.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
No, crude and nasty is booting from a DOS6 CD to edit the BAT file...and yes, I do have one in my folder
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: What I did, works. And that is all that matters...
Too many folks these days think they "have to" use all the latest toys/tools from Buzz&Hype, without actually gaining anything beyond what was available and still gets the job done for the last 30+ years...
Ralf
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with that; I write BAT files all the time.
"Do the simplest thing that could possibly work."
|
|
|
|
|
Same here, as:
PIEBALDconsult wrote: "Do the simplest thing that could possibly work."
is what I go by as well for the most part.
"I've seen more information on a frickin' sticky note!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't agree more. I've had to write many a batch file in my career. Sometimes, the old simple solutions are the best.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: "Do the simplest thing that could possibly work."
Agreed, although I'd amend it slightly, to say "Do the simplest thing which does work."
|
|
|
|
|
I'm shameless .bat user. In fact I just edited one of my script this morning. I have repetitive mundane work and I write a batch file to do the work for me.
Some of the tasks I do with batch files
- Compare my local source code against source control
- Get/Refresh latest code from source code
- Build projects and solutions
- Compare a number of folders I regularly touch.
- Check who is logged on to which shared servers
The list goes on and on. It saves me a lot of time using .bat files instead of typing commands and/or clicking.
|
|
|
|
|
You have made me happy!
I am not a proper programmer like most here, I just do what I can to make my life easier.
Fortunately on those occasions when I have run into a brick wall (ie found the circumference of ignorance as far as coding goes) I utilise the gestaltic mind of the CP community to help solve my problems.
I also prefer to use the stuff I do know, such as opening a command shell and calling a BAT file because I am within my comfort zone with such venerable practises!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
i spent all day yesterday messing with the .BAT (and .vbs) files that run my build system.
they're hideous, but they work!
|
|
|
|
|
Batch files? I still use them and though it sounds perverse, I rather like them.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|