|
Between Sean and Bob I'm not sure I really need access to the E.B.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
... and if you ever see Griff going in there with his sheep ...
... well lets just say, I wouldn't have believed you could get so many sheep in one bathroom!
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
...and the chocolate on the wall... isn't chocalate?
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear, so sorry!
I always think of you as just one of guys in the lounge.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: Oh dear, so sorry!
No need, I'm only pulling your leg! (After all I started it!)
S Houghtelin wrote: I always think of you as just one of guys in the lounge.
I'm not sure if that's a compliment, but I will take it as one.
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. It's Carob.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Nope. It's Carob.
There's no need to swear!
Carob ........ :shudders:
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
DeathByChocolate wrote: There's no need to swear!
I always start to swear when I meet Carob!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
and I thought it was because he was green with envy?
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
... ah, you are so naïve!
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
At 100K you get in but only to clean up hamsters droppings you can't actually use it until you hit 250K.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
Oh S#!+, that means anther 12 years to go.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a lot of hamster poop.
That's why I've been pumping out so many articles since I hit 100K to get out of poop duty and then the sh*t hit the fan and I got real busy.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Oh S#!+,
Eh, no, you cant
|
|
|
|
|
... er, are they hamster droppings?
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
I ass-u-me they are? It's a strict don't ask don't tell policy.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: I ass-u-me they are?
"State acheived after eating too many chocolate-covered coconut bars - bountiful"
Chris C-B
|
|
|
|
|
ass-u-me[^]
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: I might get the key to the executive bathroom
Until then you can continue using the slops bucket we all have to use. The Maunder-Hamster tells me when you reach 50K you have to empty it and keep it clean until the next person takes it over.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
After hearing about the goings on in the executive bathroom, that sounds more appealing.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: Another 3 years and 50K more rep points I might get the key to the executive bathroom.
Only so that you can clean the bathroom!
|
|
|
|
|
For the last couple of years I have simply not needed to think about the architecture of a project, I have worked on one core codebase that has been pretty much set up. I've created smaller projects, mostly internal stuff and kept them to a decent standard but now I want to start thinking about the architecture, frameworks and design patterns.
I have been looking into Entity Framework Code First, using a tiered architecture (repository pattern) and throwing stuff like membership, enterprise libary (for logging and security). Code first simply because I want to try it, EF because it is something I want to be experienced in.
So my questions are how do you choose how you architect a project, do you use the same design patterns, principles and frameworks if the scope allows? Do you like to stick to a certain architecture and use the same frameworks if again the project scope allows?
Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer)
www.simonshugar.co.uk
"If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Do you like to stick to a certain architecture and use the same frameworks
I use the same architecture, patterns, and frameworks just by virtue of the fact that all of my boilerplate code (pre-built interfaces, base classes, extension methods, etc...) are already built for a specific toolset. If I change from NHibernate to EF, or from Unity to Ninject (as a couple of examples) I'd have to re-write a lot of that. Not that I can't do that - my common library isn't *that* big - I would just need some rather compelling improvements to justify it.
And since I already have a lot of that boilerplate stuff written, all of my projects end up having the same architecture. Even my little one-off apps use the repository pattern because I only have to write a handful of lines of code and a mapping XML file and I'm ready to persist to a DB (assuming my one-off app has to persist to a DB).
|
|
|
|
|
Software Architecture depends upon three things.
- Type of Project: Highly Scalable, Highly Available, Complex, Simple, Multiple Devices, Multiple Platforms, Small, In-House, Device Specific
- Team Size: Small but Good, Small but OK, Large but Good, Large but OK
- Timeline: Enough, Not-Enough, Insane, Side Project
You shouldn't follow the same software design everywhere. You can't keep creating software with 3-tier with repository patterns, sometimes it's overkill, sometimes it's time consuming. Sometimes no one from the team wants to learn new technology i.e. Code First. So it depends...
|
|
|
|