|
Speak for yourself!
What were we talking about?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Try it with your taxes and let us know
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
bugger it, you've just reminded me I was supposed to do something ... but what it was I can't remember?
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
That's not a joke - that happens at least once a week at the grocery store: I know that I took the trip down there to buy something, but what?
So I buy some other stuff which wasn't what I came for, then go home and try to remember what I was busy with, making me take the first trip. If I'm lucky, that makes me remember what I was going to buy, and I can make a second trip to the store - this time with a slip of paper where I have written it down.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it went:
"I forgot to remember to forget you"
Elvis who?
I forget.
Arguing with a woman is like reading the Software License Agreement. In the end, you ignore everything and click "I agree".
Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
No. It's in a quantum state then where it is at the same time remembered and forgotten.
|
|
|
|
|
forgot to feed the cat again?
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
I even have a undead cactus which I forgot to water - or not.
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot. Ask me later
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
What was that you posted?
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
That's called "rediscovery."
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe. Are you using pointers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant other will never forget that I forgot it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's like "Fail safe systems fail by failing to fail fail safe"
|
|
|
|
|
As opposed to code with proper error-handling which will fail successfully.
|
|
|
|
|
"Salt is added to a rebate mix up for this mobile temple."
(10)
modified 1-Aug-17 4:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
Tabernacle.
Salt (NaCl) is added to an anagram (mix up) of rebate.
Andy B
|
|
|
|
|
Well that was quick! Congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
My "Introduction to Event Sourcing" talk is getting another run out next month and I am considering doing a show-and-tell of how the CQRS designer works and generates code.
What think you - does seeing some code add to or distract from the talk content?
Consensus seems to be no code - which chimes with my instinct.
modified 1-Aug-17 13:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It should not be too long. Scrolling up and down wildly or rapid jumping between source files will quickly confuse everyone.
Back in the days when we still used transparent plastic foils we always said that with 20 foils per second the presentation becomes a video. Avoid at all cost.
And then there also is the danger that you could fumble because you are doing two things at once: Coding and talking to the audience. If possible, it would be better to prepare the code beforehand and showing a 'paragraph'or single lines after another. This way you can concentrate what you are saying and don't have to worry about writing something suboptimal (or the other way around).
|
|
|
|
|
As long as it is rehearsed, I like it. If the person is struggling with syntax, or forgets a method name or just gets build errors, I instantly think of the session as waste of time. Post that, it is me thinking of random stuff rest of the time.
I prefer real examples and implementations during a session as that memory sticks for long compared to someone yapping and showing slides.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
I once saw a presentation where the guy had all the code already prepared and assigned to shortcut keys, this allowed him to generate the code on screen with no typing, alright 2-3 keys per method or block.
While the code was appearing on screen he could continue presenting and the audience could read the code without interference. One of the best presentations I've seen.
There is nothing more disturbing or boring than watching someone else type out code, most of us get something wrong and needs to rework the typing and your presentation has just gone down the gurgler.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Well, when i was on DWX at Nürnberg i really liked the live coding talks but on the other hand it's hard to follow up and remember at lot of that stuff. Bonus on that, they recorded the sessions so you can watch it again. That was necessary and good.
I'd say, go for it but make sure the audience can review what you did.
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
The last session I did at SDD, was part slides and part live coding session. Foolishly I hadn't checked what part the organisers would put up in the recorded sessions so the slides are present and match the audio; the live coding session though - the camera was focused on me so anyone reviewing later on would have the great joy of watching me type and explain what was going on, but having that added frisson of having to guess exactly what it was that I was typing.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|