|
dandy72 wrote: Or did you mean your icons get rearranged when you close the last running VM?
Yes, that's what I meant. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
I'm scratching my head over this one. What do you use to log into your VMs--the Hyper-V connector, or treat the VMs as regular machines and RDP into them? Or a third party such as mRemoteNG (which I've recently discovered)?
Obviously logging into a machine at different resolutions might cause desktop icons on the VM to get rearranged if the screen is suddenly too small (or larger than it was before), but you're talking about the host. I have an LG TV that I use as a secondary monitor, and powering it on/off, unlike a regular monitor, makes Windows think a display device got removed, so it might rearrange icons under those circumstances, but you're not messing with the power for a display device either.
I'm grasping at straws...but maybe the RDP (Hyper-V?) video code sends some sort of disconnect/reset event, and your "native" video driver (AMD/Nvidia/Intel?) thinks a device got disconnected in the same way my TV does, and causes the entire desktop to get rearranged. Maybe if that's the case I'd look for a newer version of the video driver, if it's really old.
I'm afraid I don't have much else to offer at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use Microsoft's OneDrive. Works very well for me.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, OneDrive is okay too.
Of course it used to be called Microsoft LiveDrive. 
They renamed it too.
Also, at one point I had both onedrive and google drive and they were clashing with each other.
|
|
|
|
|
Even though at one point MS was heavy into naming everything "Live[Something]", I don't remember them ever having something called "Live Drive", and googling around currently shows a UK company using that name and owning the trademark.
Surely you're thinking of SkyDrive? (which MS renamed to OneDrive because of Sky TV, incidentally also from the UK)...
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: Surely you're thinking of SkyDrive?
"Yes, and don't call me surely." 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, probably just bad branding on Microsoft's part again.
If the user can't remember the name of it -- because you change it every 32 seconds -- it's bad branding. 
|
|
|
|
|
dunno, I prefer descriptive names - less confusion for people trailing the bleeding edge.
grumpy old man rant of the weekend:
used to have "sourceforge" (more descriptive), now it's "git" which in many countries mean "stupid person"
azure sounds like a jewellery item, says nothing about what it does; amazon cloud - ahh, sensible
wtf is silverlight, it's neither solver nor light (and still not 100% sure what it was)
surface is something you put your coffee cup on
playstore - stupid name, sounds like it's only for kids or/and music
siri is an exotic girl's name, cortana a misspelled car name
...
so much new sh*t coming out these days, can we go back to calling them spades?
also wondering if they wanted to avoid confusion with their driverless cars?
... give something a stupid name and it'll only bite you in the ass when you make other stupid things
Stupid kids! Broke my signature they did.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: also wondering if they wanted to avoid confusion with their driverless cars?
This probably is the answer. 
|
|
|
|
|
I use a nas in my house. And a server at work.
I'm not givin a nibble to anyone where I can't touch the box physically.
I come from the past. In the past, the mere thought of giving out your data to an outside vendor was ludicrous unless under the strictest guidelines and bonded courier.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: now it's "git" which in many countries mean "stupid person"
Wait till they bring out a new version and then you can feel right at home using the "Old Git"
As for Silverlight - one framwork that has been now been replaced by an entire stack of tech hence light and I made plenty of silver from it, makes perfect sense to me.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: grumpy old man rant of the weekend:
How do you feel about Apple's iSomething nomenclature?
|
|
|
|
|
... to Cassini[^]
Gonna miss you, kid. You did a damn fine job.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
As a Microsoft fanboy I loved my Lumia 640XL, but as that fanboyism is wearing off it is starting to annoy me a lot more than it used to with apps crashing and closing by themselves. The lack of apps as well is rather annoying and never used to bother me, but it's getting quite bothersome now as Three UK don't even have an app for it anymore. That said, even Microsoft's own apps seem to be at least as good on Android and iOS, if not better. Windows Phone was great but it has lost its appeal so it can be more like the others.
The only thing is I don't think there's many good phones on the market. I want a phone that's supported for at least a few years and where the apps won't crash constantly. I want apps to be supported on my phone with the latest features, instead of waiting months waiting for features that have been implemented on the other OS's (ahem..spotify).
I feel like an iPhone but there's no swipe keyboard. I then feel like an Android but will the phone even be supported past a year.
I then feel like making my own phone but then I realise I'm not that smart, nor do I have the money to make one or hire those who are.
Am I too old? Am I too picky? Am I depressed? Or is the phone market just that bad?
Excuse my English, I hate writing on tablets.
Hassan
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse my English, I hate writing on tablets  aaahaa the tablet is the reason of _our_ bad english, good hint  
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I always want to agree with these types of posts, but the reality for me is entirely different. I have three Android tablets that have never seen a single OS update throughout their entire respective lifetimes--I've long come to the conclusion that when a device comes with Android version X, it'll die on version X. It becomes abandonware the moment you walk out the store. I'm faced with old apps that today are crashing all the time, manage to get the whole OS to reboot on a whim, web pages that won't render because the included browser is obsolete, apps that won't install because the OS is too old, etc. I'm done buying Android-based hardware.
Meanwhile, Microsoft's latest mobile platform--Windows Phone 10--which has been all but abandoned, according to all tech media sources, still gets regular updates (the latest one for my Lumia 640 just came out today) as MS is still keeping the phone OS in lockstep with Windows 10 Insider updates. The only app I've ever seen misbehaving in a predictable fashion on it is Microsoft's own Power BI. According to the MS engineer I traded emails with, he's not surprised the app is running into problems "given how resource-starved the Lumia 640 is"--which came as a surprise to me, because I never felt this was even the case with this phone--the OS has never felt sluggish because it's running out of memory, or the CPU was too slow, or anything like that.
So...WP10 is a dead-end, I've been burnt too many times by Android, and I refuse to give Apple a dime. If I had an actual use for a phone, what the heck would my options be??
|
|
|
|
|
Blackberry? Are they still alive?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I also have their Playbook tablet from way back when. If their current phone OS is the same as their tablet OS, it's also hopelessly out of date. And their app "store" is even more embarrassing than the Windows one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My 640Xl feels resource starved as Edge closes by itself, and it "crashes" in the sense the tab won't display anything even when I switch to other tabs. I don't know if it's because I was on the slow ring of insider update, but it's the same on fast ring. I wouldn't mind giving feedback but even that crashes for me.
Hassan
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: when a device comes with Android version X, it'll die on version X. It becomes abandonware the moment you walk out the store
To some extent that must be true always. At some point the hardware will not run anything new.
In terms of new major versions of an OS that is probably always true because the new version exists to take advantage of something new in the world. Otherwise there wouldn't be a new version.
I know that there have been updates to my Android tablet but I haven't bothered to check what it is. And I don't expect it to substitute for my computer nor even do that much.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: At some point the hardware will not run anything new.
Sure, but not a single OS update, ever? I can't help but feel Android device makers are taking advantage of people when their "upgrade path" consists of telling people to replace their devices altogether.
All I'm saying is that my Surface Pro (first gen) tablet came with Windows 8.0, and it's been upgraded to 8.1, then 10. My Lumia 640 phone came with Windows 8.0 and is also now on 10. OTOH, my three Android tablets came with 4.2, 4.3 and 6.0 and that's what they're still running today.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote:
I can't help but feel Android device makers are taking advantage of people when their "upgrade path" consists of telling people to replace their devices altogether.
Android is basically open hardware while Apple and Windows are fairly limited in configurations.
I believe there are two parties guilty here; the manufacturers and the providers. I also believe there is some collusion between them to keep us coming back to buy more.
The traditional cell phone purchase model in the US for many years was the two year contract. The cost of the phone was reduced up front and subsidized by 2 years of service and often a phone payment. After 2 years the phone was paid for and that extra (eg) $5.00 went away. The carriers also had carrier-locks placed on them so that you couldn't take it to another carrier.
Then there are the manufacturers. They are dealing with the provides and have to translate the updated Android version to what will work with a particular phone; and further create an additional 5 branches off of it for the universal version as well as 4 (for the US) custom versions as the providers all wanted things customized or removed from it.
Who came up with charging ports no longer working after 2 years I don't know; but that was the lifespan of every Galaxy phone I had.
I'm now using a Nexus 4. Came with 4.2 and received a few incremental updates as well as version update to Lollipop and another incremental. This was over a 2-1/2 year span. But it still works fine today and can still charge up
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
